STR said:
Supposedly the Rc hardness of the dendritic steel is 40, but the carbide crystals are like 70Rc so that would explain the cutting and edge retention.
Annealed steel is full of hard carbides, it doesn't have great edge retention, and carbides are far too small to do any cutting. Wear resistance is secondary to deformation in most cutting which is why steeling makes such a massive difference as you are correcting roll and deformation. If the base material is soft and it rolls it doesn't matter if the carbides didn't wear as the edge isn't formed any more.
I think you are the only one that has used this Boye knife that doesn't think it cuts great...
This is what I said in the review :
"If a really high corrosion resistance is required then these are an excellent choice, ergonomic handles, secure lock, easy to sharpen and solid cutting ability."
I would not argue that it doesn't cut great as that is too vague to contend as you have not given a baseline.
In general I was not extremely impressed with the cutting ability having lots of knives that would out cut them several times over as noted.
Mainly I was disappointed as I was expecting the performance similar to the Boye hunters which had much more acute edge profiles, I was pretty surprised by the shallow hollow grinds.
I was expecting something more like the U2 actually.
I have an old old article about dendritic steel from one of the blade or knife mags before it was available in mass like now and even that went on and on about how well dendritic steel cut due to the aggressive hard teeth and so on..
Yeah that is nonsense, you can find the same thing about wootz, there are lots of myths about knives. The size of carbides is too small to provide aggression on a slice, you can see this if you just look at the edge under mild magnification 10x-20x and compare a polished dendretic edge to a medium spyderco finished non-dendritic edge.
The reasons that dendretic steels got a reputation for high aggression is because of two reasons. First off all Boye ground his older blades, specifically his drop point hunters and the smaller folders which high flat grinds and very thin edges, ~0.005" so the cutting ability was high and the edges were left coarse which raised the slicing aggression.
Here is a link to an add I found for it. Even they say how well it cuts as one of the selling points. Are you suggesting that this is just a flat out lie?
http://www.shomer-tec.com/site/product.cfm?id=99884DF0-0F9B-7016-B469823B3482F249
Depends, there are two common definations of lying, one means to tell false information with the intent to deceive, the other ignores intent. I personally use the first one and I don't think the above is lying, they probably believe it themselves. However it does contains lots of false information as well as pure promotional hype such as :
"will out-cut any other knife"
which is nonsense, when you see something that over the top you basically write it off as promotional fluff.
I have lots of knives which will out cut that one, some many times over. As well not all materials are uniformly cut better by the same knife, there are lots of things that an Alantic Salt will out cut an Opinel on for example, the reverse is true as well.
Arguing for performance because you can find an ad for a knife supporting your viewpoint is hardly solid ground, take a look around and see some of the ads that are out there. Even Shomer-Tec isn't consistent, they have no problem stating this in another ad :
"In fact, the overall feel, cutting prowess, and carry comfort will convince you to select this knife as your first choice for everyday carry."
and yet about another knife still :
"No matter how many knives you own, the Clipit® is the one that you will carry and use. "
etc.
What was your reason for comparing this small blade knife to the Chinook which is a whole different league in size and blade thickness and also made for different purposes? Woudn't it make more sense to compare it to say another boat knife of a same or similar size?
That comparions was used to reference the edge retention of the steel, it wasn't extended to overall functionality, on such a comparison the Salt or the Calypso Jr. would be more sensible choices which would have been the case if the review was more extensive. I didn't do it because the performance wasn't there and I had looked at the blade material extensively already.
-Cliff