- Joined
- Jul 16, 2016
- Messages
- 1,922
Maybe it's me, but when I buy a knife or other weapon I buy it with the assumption that it's mine for life. I'm not going to be trading it or selling it. To each his own, but sometimes I read posts here and in other forums that are downright "nitpickety" in my honest opinion. Some stuff is worth a hassle to send a knife back to the maker, like blade centering, or failure to fire with an auto, or a glaring visual defect, but other things, like color not being exactly what was pictured, maybe off a tiny shade, or sharpness, or a heap of other things I see people gripe about just seem nitpickety. I wonder if makers and retailers don't get those returns and think "oh joy, another pain in the butt", and then add that person's name on a list of people to be wary of. I'd like to hear feedback on how reasonable expectations of satisfaction should be. Is there a point where it's being nitpickety? Does the price matter, considering I'm certainly more vigilant on something costing $500 than $100? Is there an expectation by manufacturers and makers that a certain amount of "smoothing out, tweaking, and repair" should be done at home by the purchaser? I'm just wondering, because on any given new offering thread here you're likely to see 2-3 people sending knives back over an issue, some not so serious, some glaringly so.