No More Blades? Nah.

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a good option!! And I've thought about taking the blades out of my SOG Paratool in order to carry on flights, but I'm afraid they'd take it anyway.

Zieg
 
I would consider buying that if I traveled a lot. I use the other tools on an SAK a lot more than I use the blades.
 
That’s wild. I was just thinking the other day how I’d consider buying SAKs without blades. My son’s first “knife” that he could use on his own when he was… maybe 3? Was a jetsetter. He’d clip bits of paper all day with that thing. He’s 6 now and still will to this day.

I almost never carry a SAK all by itself, either, to the point where the blades are usually a backup option.

I like that they are catering to places where I’d feel completely naked without some kind of tool, even if it’s not a knife. And for people with work places forbidding knives ( Dergyll Dergyll ) it might be a great suggestion.
 
Or, you could understand that Victorinox responding to the framing of a SAK as a weapon is not good, without resorting to low effort insults like "MAGA." They aren't just "offering alternatives," they are responding to a narrative frame.

The issue is being framed such that a SAK is a weapon, and it appears that Victorinox is responding within that narrative frame. This is a quote from Carl Elsener in a different article about this that concerned me: “In some markets, the blade creates an image of a weapon.“

The “blade” isn’t creating the image, a narrative is being constructed (by dishonest people, imo) and that is what creates the image.

I think Vic would be better served long term to try and educate why a knife, especially a SAK, is a tool and not a weapon. And if they want to have bladeless models to meet demand, fine. Just not as an apparent capitulation to the crazies. They will never be satisfied anyway.
 
they are responding to a narrative frame.
I have no clue what a narrative frame is, but I know what laws are, and in some countries there is no legal carry of blades, as in the case of France.
I think Vic would be better served long term to try and educate why a knife, especially a SAK, is a tool and not a weapon.
I disagree- Victorinox is best served by focusing on making knives (or multitools), and let the people of their own sovereign nations sort out their knife laws.
 
It's a good option!! And I've thought about taking the blades out of my SOG Paratool in order to carry on flights, but I'm afraid they'd take it anyway.

Zieg

This, I've been interested in something that works well that's TSA worthy for a bit. My answer for now has been 2 knipex, cobra and pliers wrench, and a mini ratchet that uses bit drivers. It can do a lot, but there's still a lot it can't do and it's not the lightest thing in the world either.
 
I have no clue what a narrative frame is, but I know what laws are, and in some countries there is no legal carry of blades, as in the case of France.

I disagree- Victorinox is best served by focusing on making knives (or multitools), and let the people of their own sovereign nations sort out their knife laws.
I’m not saying Vic should sort out knife laws.

The question is why is Vic doing this now. I don’t know French knife laws, but my guess is they did not change recently. So why is victorinox choosing now to go down this path?
 
This, I've been interested in something that works well that's TSA worthy for a bit. My answer for now has been 2 knipex, cobra and pliers wrench, and a mini ratchet that uses bit drivers. It can do a lot, but there's still a lot it can't do and it's not the lightest thing in the world either.
TSA is known to confiscate even knife-less tools, like the knife-less leathermen or the Vic jetsetter. I don’t think I’d risk the forced “donation” if they decided it didn’t pass muster as a carry on.
 
How many hours or months does it take for the Victorinox dev team to remove one blade from a knife? The story is bunk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top