I like his reviews.
Sometimes he really shows his butt and doesn't know what he's talking about.
For instance in his axe videos: In one he's trying to buck a tree with a
splitting axe, in another he uses a Cold Steel trail boss right out of the box without sharpening it (if it's anything like the CS hawks I got, it not only came dull, but with a .5mm FLAT where the edge should be), and concludes axes are too inefficient and energy intensive.
The other issue I have with him, is he's a cheapskate. While that's OK, he really locks himself out of a lot of good stuff. His comment in the linked video "Who's going to spend $500 on a knife and then go thrash on it? I won't!" Well, I'd say once you shoot down all of the naysayers arguments, it always comes down to the fact that they don't want to pay the price for a Busse. I have a thing with Busse and their prices: I refuse to spend the kind of money Busse charges and then
NOT use the blade. You can bet that sucker is going to earn its keep. Besides if you don't drop the money on Busse or other products, like Kifaru packs, you'll never find out that they live up to their "hype".
Now, I do agree with his assessment that if you are going to carry ONE knife/sharp thingie for SURVIVAL, a 3-4" blade isn't going to git 'er done. I prefer top go larger, but the choice of a 6-8" blade as your one and only, is right. IMO 6" is where a blade starts being big enough to be used for everything, although you still have to be somewhat creative using it for chopping.
Now, his idea that a survival knife having to be 6-7" long and .25" thick, seems like he'd blow a load over the Tank Buster, ASH-1 or ASH-1LE, or the SFNO (although some are slightly thinner than .25", if he'd just stop buying crap knives and get off his wallet.