Fullo,
I don't want to get into a pissing contest, but why don't you go a little easier on the guy? First you jump to conclusions on what he shipped and go on the attack, then after the guy tells you it was indeed "media"...you continue on. Give the guy a break!! Some people who do not own a business and deal with merchant accounts are not used to the logic that is part of the credit card world we live in.
Here is a merchant account scenario that is far worse than the paypal deal, but happens every day with regular merchant accounts and has to be looked at (unfortunately) as the cost of doing business.
You sell someone an item (comic book or knife) and ship it by a method that gives you tracking and maybe even insurance (like Fed Ex. Ground). The customer never contacts you, but calls his credit card company and says he is not paying because he never got the item. The merchant is immediately charged a $20 chargback fee, regardless of your answer (or the amount of the charge) or what proof you might have. So, you now supply the Fed. Ex. tracking number to your cc clearance company. The customer is contacted, but insists he never got the item. You are now notified....another $20 fee is charged for a secondary chargeback. You again supply the tracking information and a letter from Fed. Ex. showing that the item has been delivered. Now you get a third $20 chargeback fee. This is now a total of $60 regardless of the amount of the initial charge.
So, a letter comes in the mail from the customer's daughter stating that your customer is senile and has made a mistake. Believe it or not, the $60 in fees remains, as they are administrative fees to straighten out the matter. Now it is straightened out. You are out $60 and the initial charge for $10 is reinstated. This is far worse than the paypal incident (and by the way, each time that $10 goes in and out of your account on the chargeback rebuttals, the 2% fee is charged, just like paypal did to silent hunter). The cc processors make a fortune on this stuff.
It gets even worse. Let's say the guy isn't senile and this thing continues. As far as credit card companies (VISA/MC) are concerned, postal confirmation and tracking are not sufficient. We have sent postal confirmation information showing an item delivered many times and each time a lot of fees, but the initial charge is reversed in favor of the customer. The answer is that you need a signature delivery. But it gets even worse. If you have a signature of a household member...but not the purchaser (person who used the credit card)....you are also out. The only way you can win is if you have the signature of the cardholder showing that he received the item. All of the chargeback fees still stand, as well as the 2% in and out on chargeback and rebuttal.
We do approx. $20,000 every day on credit cards and the only way to look at this and stay sane is "the cost of doing business". When it is a small paypal transaction with a person who is not used to this abuse, it is very difficult to take any loss.
Let's try to be kinder and gentler to our brothers!
Nick/out.