"Old Knives"

You heard me! It appears that this knife has gone unused and looks as though that it has the edge that it left the factory with. Aside from the one place here on the mark side where a bone chip was puttied(upper left corner near bolster) but other than that, this knife is a perfect example of the classic Remington Bullet.

One of the first things I noticed about this knife was how low the blades sit in the handle. Very little of these blades are exposed when closed. There is an "ease" for the clip blade so that it could be completely tucked away inside the handle.

The next thing I noticed was how nicely rounded it is. I have one of the 1985 "reproduction" knives and really there is very little comparison to the real McCoy...not worth mentioning the differences here. I'll just say that the original is a better made knife.;)

I know that I am guilty of being a "swedge snob" on knives...not really liking the looks of modern knives that haven't had that perfect final touch...but sometimes there's a place for swedgeless. Notice no swedge on the clipblade, on purpose, so(I assume) that guys profile could be kept as low as possible. Instead, the spine of the clip blade is radiused. The spey blade, on the other hand, is swedged and it's spine is NOT radiused.

The factory finishes appear to be intact on both blades. The master clip blade still has the bright, crocus finish on the mark side with etch intact and the rest of the blade finishes are glazed(I hope I have the terminology correct..please correct me if I'm wrong) Notice how high the nail nicks are on both blades, even in the swedge of the spey blade.

R-4353-1.jpg


R-4353-2.jpg


R-4353-3.jpg


R-4353-4.jpg


R-4353-5.jpg


R-4353-6.jpg


R-4353-7.jpg


R-4353-8.jpg
 
Last edited:
What a time-warp knife!! Shows you how they were made without the interference of a dreaded knife-cleaner. I love every freckle and wart on that stunning knife. Thanks for showing us, Kerry!!:thumbup:
 
That Remington is a beauty! Just look at the clean blade grinds. Those guys back then sure knew how to make a quality knife.
 
MSA Ideal Bowie
circa:1898

This was a gift to me from my Great Uncle before his death in early 80's.

HPIM0645.sized.jpg


HPIM0643.sized.jpg


HPIM0644.sized.jpg


HPIM0646.sized.jpg
 
Last edited:
That is a real beauty! I sure would like to see more detail on the scabbard, the back side and does it have a liner?

At one time many opted to carry their knives in a pocket, pack or saddle bags. These scabbards interest me.
 
That is a real beauty! I sure would like to see more detail on the scabbard, the back side and does it have a liner?

At one time many opted to carry their knives in a pocket, pack or saddle bags. These scabbards interest me.

As per your request...Here are pics of the back. There is no liner, only leather.

100_0780.sized.jpg


100_0781.sized.jpg


100_0782.sized.jpg


100_0784.sized.jpg


100_0785.sized.jpg
 
Here' a 6 blade SMOKERS KNIFE Stamped "No 6 NORFOLK ST SHEFFIELD ENGLAND" on the master sheep foot blade. And "ROGERS CUTLERS TO HER MAGISTY" on the pen blade. These stamps date the knife to: After the 1891 Tariff act and before 1901 with the death of Queen Victoria. Check the Cigar fork stamped "CIGAR", and the "BODKIN" for piercing a cigar before smoking. The F&F on this knife is of the highest quality. It measures 2 1/4" closed.
SMOKER%20BK.jpg
&
SMOKER%20FT.jpg
 
You heard me! It appears that this knife has gone unused and looks as though that it has the edge that it left the factory with. Aside from the one place here on the mark side where a bone chip was puttied(upper left corner near bolster) but other than that, this knife is a perfect example of the classic Remington Bullet.

One of the first things I noticed about this knife was how low the blades sit in the handle. Very little of these blades are exposed when closed. There is an "ease" for the clip blade so that it could be completely tucked away inside the handle.

The next thing I noticed was how nicely rounded it is. I have one of the 1985 "reproduction" knives and really there is very little comparison to the real McCoy...not worth mentioning the differences here. I'll just say that the original is a better made knife.;)

I know that I am guilty of being a "swedge snob" on knives...not really liking the looks of modern knives that haven't had that perfect final touch...but sometimes there's a place for swedgeless. Notice no swedge on the clipblade, on purpose, so(I assume) that guys profile could be kept as low as possible. Instead, the spine of the clip blade is radiused. The spey blade, on the other hand, is swedged and it's spine is NOT radiused.

The factory finishes appear to be intact on both blades. The master clip blade still has the bright, crocus finish on the mark side with etch intact and the rest of the blade finishes are glazed(I hope I have the terminology correct..please correct me if I'm wrong) Notice how high the nail nicks are on both blades, even in the swedge of the spey blade.

R-4353-1.jpg


R-4353-2.jpg


R-4353-3.jpg


R-4353-4.jpg


R-4353-5.jpg


R-4353-6.jpg


R-4353-7.jpg


R-4353-8.jpg



Unbelievable.How do you control not putting a knife like that in your pocket and not use it?What's a Remington like that worth these days? 2-4 grand?
Thanks for sharing
 
"George Wostenholm called this pattern a pruning knife in their 1885 catalog. Many call it a farmers jack, still others a rooster's comb. A very handy 4 " closed knife built on a single 5/32" wide spring. Decent sized, yet slim and unobtrusive in the pocket. I can account for much of the wear on this one personally. I've had a few of these early Ulsters in stag, it all looked very much the same as this example."

Not my knife,or description,just posting to add to the thread & Thanks,all, for keeping it going :thumbup:
-Vince

09-04-2009_064426PM.jpg


09-04-2009_064631PM.jpg


09-04-2009_064850PM.jpg


09-04-2009_065327PM.jpg


09-04-2009_065657PM.jpg


09-04-2009_070334PM.jpg


09-04-2009_071513PM.jpg
 
I really like those farmer's jacks. Too bad they always command prices above what I can currently afford.
 
Back
Top