Bram, I'm not disputing the effectiveness of a knife. I'm saying that it is too limited to be a "primary" defensive tool. I'm well aware of the statistics and averages. Who is to say that the situation you find yourself in will be statistically correct (did I just coin a new phrase
?)?
As you said referring to a firearm "its only the best under the circumstances that let it." Well, the same is true of a knife. It would be equally foolish to insinuate that a knife is the ultimate answer.
I think that a firearm AND knife complement each other nicely. Having sense enough to avoid trouble and places that trouble are most likely doesn't hurt, either.
Lastly, how many "average" people are able to use the knife or gun effectively under stress anyway? Very few, I would think. Bram, your statements may be very true when referring to people who are trained, but most people (regardless of how well they THINK they can take care of themselves) do not take the time and effort to get training, nor is the normal person very aware of his surroundings.
Perhaps not a popular viewpoint, but a realistic one.
Thought I would throw this in, too. Most of the scenarios that I have seen used in training to show the knife's superiority from the infamous seven-yard-line feature a guy with a knife (already in his hand) charging a guy who is proceeding to draw his (holstered) handgun. Yes, I do realize that the exercise is generally used to show that a gun is not insurance against a knife attack, but if you are indeed defending yourself (knife vs gun) and not attacking, wouldn't it make more sense (for our purposes here) for the knife guy to start with his knife in his pocket, and the offensive party depicted by the gun-toter to already have his gun drawn? Much different results. Sorry, but I have a hard time believing that a knife in the pocket beats a drawn gun (what does?) at 20ft. Contrary to what is apparently popular belief, the person doing the attacking is not the one who is suprised and unprepared. Reality is a guy with a half-drawn knife and a bullet in him. Reality just sucks, but there it is.
Again, I'm not disputing the effectiveness of the knife, but I assume that since we are talking about self-defense here, that we are the attackee. An individual's awareness would play a larger role than his choice of edged weapon.
My apologies for straying off topic.
[This message has been edited by Owen (edited 10-06-2000).]