- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
- Messages
- 14,664
Yeah, for the record, I am pro modification, I’m just commenting on the fact that companies may feel inclined to take steps to make that more difficult. I personally don’t really care for the “ability” to pop the safety mechanism off with the knife closed- that could be seen as a weakness in the design.For starters, the ring now only rotates clockwise, which puts the sharp corners of the ring in just the right spot to create hotspots that wear on my hands in use. In addition, each Opinel I've gotten with the new lock has a locking ring that is too loose and too easy to disengage for my taste. So, I modify all of my Opinels before putting them in my pocket:
As to the “single-sidedness” and your proposed solution, I think it’s brilliant and if I was Opinel, I would strongly consider making that update.
I think it’s not really an overhaul. All the components are largely the same, they’re just using the ferrule as a spring and probably changing the tang a bit. Blade shape while they’re at it, it seems.I think it's regrettable that such a well established cutlery firm has to overhaul its flagship model in order to cater to overzealous legislators bent on control. But, I can't fault a firm for trying to stay ahead of the curve and offer viable options for its customers. Hopefully Opinel offers a slimmer design, as mentioned above, since they no longer strictly need the virolock.
Technically, to meet the requirements of their target audience, they’d just have to revert to the pre-1950’s configuration. Remove the virolock on a number 6 and blunt the tip and there ya go. I see this as an attempt to offer functionality over the “friction folder” capability.
But certainly, as you said, we can’t fault a company for working within the confines they are provided. We might not like the laws of various countries, but that doesn’t change anything.