- Joined
- Dec 3, 2000
- Messages
- 3,002
Well...after much deliberation, I've decided it's going to be a titanium or aluminum J-frame Smith. (I'll bet you never saw that coming!)
There's only a few items left to decide
38 special only, or .357 (app. $200 more)
two or three inch BBL?
Hammerless or exposed?
the .38 vs. .357 is a bit of a toughy. It's main purpose in life will be every day concealed carry, around town. I'm sure I'll do like 99% of the rest of the world if I buy the .357- put a cylinder through it and say "sh!t that hurts, I aint doin' that no more!" and shooting nuthin' but .38 +Ps from then on. Besides I already have three .357 revolvers around. The main idea of the .357 over the .38 was something to take backpacking and fishing and such, but with a titanium Taurus, a S&W 586, and a Ruger Security Six I've got plenty of other .357s to play in the woods with, two of which I know I can shoot better, and one of which I'm pretty sure I can shoot better, but carries 7 rounds as opposed to 5 anyways.
On the other hand...over the course of a lifetime of owning a gun, an extra $200 is a flash in the pot. Sometimes I wind up in areas where ammo is very scarce, and would like the option of cramming .357s in the gun if the need arises due to ammo scarcity. Also, if I wind up hiking on trails, in protected areas, it might be nice to have a more powerful gun that can be concealed, so as not to upset the granola munchin' yuppie druid treehugger types. Also, if you take care of the ounces the pounds will take care of themselves, and 14 ounces is pretty darn light if you're on a long hike. And that means alot when you're old and out of shape.
two or three inch barrel...hmmm...leaning towards two. a little easier to deal with on a daily basis, and as I've mentioned, I've got other .357s with four inch tubes, not to mention the .45s. Also it's less barrel for someone to grab onto if the sh!t ever hits the fan and I should ever need it.
But a three inch BBl has adjustable sights, and will be just a little bit easier to shoot accurately, an important consideration if one should find themselves foraging in the woods and trying to shoot pot meat. On the other hand, a two inch barrel will have fixed sights, with no blades to ever break off, or shoot or fall out of adjustment.
As far as hammerless Vs. Spur hammer....well....I guess it's the same old toss up. I'd prefer hammerless for concealed carry, but in the woods it's awful nice to be able to thumbcock your gun. I like hammerless because it's less space for dust bunnies and such to gather, it's easier on your clothes, and a little safer. (I've bumped against car seats, doorways, etc. before and discovered hammers cocked, or safeties disengaged) Also always nice to be able to thumbcock a gun and take a more careful shot.
Right now I'm leaning towards a 442- hammerless, two inch BBL, and .38 special only. I could use the extra $200 to buy holsters, ammo, and speedloaders. But...that 360 still looks awfully nice....
There's only a few items left to decide
38 special only, or .357 (app. $200 more)
two or three inch BBL?
Hammerless or exposed?
the .38 vs. .357 is a bit of a toughy. It's main purpose in life will be every day concealed carry, around town. I'm sure I'll do like 99% of the rest of the world if I buy the .357- put a cylinder through it and say "sh!t that hurts, I aint doin' that no more!" and shooting nuthin' but .38 +Ps from then on. Besides I already have three .357 revolvers around. The main idea of the .357 over the .38 was something to take backpacking and fishing and such, but with a titanium Taurus, a S&W 586, and a Ruger Security Six I've got plenty of other .357s to play in the woods with, two of which I know I can shoot better, and one of which I'm pretty sure I can shoot better, but carries 7 rounds as opposed to 5 anyways.
On the other hand...over the course of a lifetime of owning a gun, an extra $200 is a flash in the pot. Sometimes I wind up in areas where ammo is very scarce, and would like the option of cramming .357s in the gun if the need arises due to ammo scarcity. Also, if I wind up hiking on trails, in protected areas, it might be nice to have a more powerful gun that can be concealed, so as not to upset the granola munchin' yuppie druid treehugger types. Also, if you take care of the ounces the pounds will take care of themselves, and 14 ounces is pretty darn light if you're on a long hike. And that means alot when you're old and out of shape.

two or three inch barrel...hmmm...leaning towards two. a little easier to deal with on a daily basis, and as I've mentioned, I've got other .357s with four inch tubes, not to mention the .45s. Also it's less barrel for someone to grab onto if the sh!t ever hits the fan and I should ever need it.
But a three inch BBl has adjustable sights, and will be just a little bit easier to shoot accurately, an important consideration if one should find themselves foraging in the woods and trying to shoot pot meat. On the other hand, a two inch barrel will have fixed sights, with no blades to ever break off, or shoot or fall out of adjustment.
As far as hammerless Vs. Spur hammer....well....I guess it's the same old toss up. I'd prefer hammerless for concealed carry, but in the woods it's awful nice to be able to thumbcock your gun. I like hammerless because it's less space for dust bunnies and such to gather, it's easier on your clothes, and a little safer. (I've bumped against car seats, doorways, etc. before and discovered hammers cocked, or safeties disengaged) Also always nice to be able to thumbcock a gun and take a more careful shot.
Right now I'm leaning towards a 442- hammerless, two inch BBL, and .38 special only. I could use the extra $200 to buy holsters, ammo, and speedloaders. But...that 360 still looks awfully nice....