Comeuppance
Fixed Blade EDC Emisssary
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Messages
- 4,765
People around here seem to get very heated when discussing imitations of high-end knives.
Why?
It seems to be stated quite often that it is theft. It's design theft, certainly, but do they really detract from the market those knives are aimed at? Surely, someone in the market for a $800 Chris Reeve knife is not going to buy a knockoff of dubious quality instead. Are the producers of high-end knives actually losing money over this? If so: is that documented fact or is it speculation?
Would it still be an issue if they didn't have the names attached? For example, if the fake CRKs and Hinderers had the actual manufacturer's names - or is the overall design of the knife still a large enough factor?
Note that I am not supporting or defending anything.
Let's discuss this like adults, not like zealots or fanboys.
Why?
It seems to be stated quite often that it is theft. It's design theft, certainly, but do they really detract from the market those knives are aimed at? Surely, someone in the market for a $800 Chris Reeve knife is not going to buy a knockoff of dubious quality instead. Are the producers of high-end knives actually losing money over this? If so: is that documented fact or is it speculation?
Would it still be an issue if they didn't have the names attached? For example, if the fake CRKs and Hinderers had the actual manufacturer's names - or is the overall design of the knife still a large enough factor?
Note that I am not supporting or defending anything.
Let's discuss this like adults, not like zealots or fanboys.