Mixed PayPal

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've looked at other options, and at this time my conclusion is that it is all six of one, half a dozen of the other. I am not changing from PayPal at this time, because even though evidence is that some of the shareholders hoped to weaponize people's money against them, others shareholders obviously did not want to allow the financial fallout to affect them, and they walked back the misinformation clause. Additionally, the concern I had regarding the "sole discretion" clause is present in others that I have looked at as well, so I do not see a tangible difference between any of the payment processing services I have looked at yet, and the fact remains that PayPal has done me right all this time.
I pretty much agree with these sentiments. The following post, however, is my opinion though and does not necessarily reflect on David Mary David Mary .

If other online banking/payment services aren't currently doing just as PP, they soon will. The outrage against WOKE practices is laughable when the alternative is people doing and saying whatever they want, targeting anyone they please. The lack of civility and/or self restraint in our society these days requires businesses to protect themselves from the counter clash and other outrage, real or perceived.

I don't object to the terms of use though admittedly some do raise my eyebrows and bristles my self reliant nature. The $2,500.00 fine thing will likely never get used or will be imposed on the most obvious and extreme violations (and will result in a law suit). I think of it as an over the top Caution/Deterrent to those who might otherwise push the boundaries.

I've never had PayPal balk at any of my transactions over 12 years and multi thousands of $$s worth of transactions unless the word DAMASCUS came up. That happened twice - and was reviewed and approved within 12 hours or less. Just last week, I sold a knife and the buyer wrote KNIFE is the notes without issue. Just know your laws and don't use PP for switch blades or broadcast that that is what you are doing. Helps too if you don't give your customer a reason to flag the purchase.

"The fact remains that PayPal has done me right all this time." in this regard I completely agree with DM.
 
Last edited:
I have had a pending payment held by PP for 1 month now...$200. Contacted them multiple times with no resolution. I no longer have any faith in paypal and will not use them again, even after years of good transactions.
 
I have had a pending payment held by PP for 1 month now...$200. Contacted them multiple times with no resolution. I no longer have any faith in paypal and will not use them again, even after years of good transactions.

Awful lot left unsaid here boss. No way to know if PayPal is at fault or you. Perhaps you could start a thread here in the GB&U and discuss the details. You know, like your own thread for your own issue. I'll check in on it and help if I can.
 
...
 
Last edited:
XJ-linux XJ-linux I thought to myself, maybe he's not joking, what does the "news" say? I looked it up and sure enough apparently there is more misinformation about PayPal changing its terms back to including misinformation as a violation of their acceptable use policy. You can read the policy for yourself. It's not in there. I hope my "laugh" reaction and asking you if it was a joke was not taken as an insult. I really did think it was probably an attempt at humor, and frankly would have been a good one! Best regards!
 
I apologize. I thought this was a thread to discuss ongoing issues with paypal.
 
I apologize. I thought this was a thread to discuss ongoing issues with paypal.
Not sure why DM jumped on you for that comment. This thread is titled “Paypal.”

I’d be pissed off too if PP had my $200 on hold for a month. There are other ways to take a payment.
 
Last edited:
Navman-Here or in a seperate thread, it could use some more detailed explanation for us to have an idea of what is going on.
 
Not sure why DM jumped on you for that comment.

Read my comment again because I explained perfectly well my response. You think it is a "jump on"? That sounds aggressive. If that was your take you are way of base. GB&U is for people to share their experiences and hopefully find resolution with the help of the community. He can reduce his chance of finding resolution by being vague, and further dilute his issue by including it in someone else's thread started to share their own experience if he wants. I suggested a better way.
 
navman navman no need to apologize. My comment was intended to help you get the most out of the GB&U.
 
Didn’t they reintroduce the thing they said they didn’t do a week ago, just today?
yes they did

 
Read my comment again because I explained perfectly well my response. You think it is a "jump on"? That sounds aggressive. If that was your take you are way of base. GB&U is for people to share their experiences and hopefully find resolution with the help of the community. He can reduce his chance of finding resolution by being vague, and further dilute his issue by including it in someone else's thread started to share their own experience if he wants. I suggested a better way.
Didn't mean to offend by saying "jumped on." I don't think I was off base. That's how I read your comment. You told him to start another PayPal thread...how many do we need?
 
I apologize. I thought this was a thread to discuss ongoing issues with paypal.
Just the way I see it.
If you just want to complain, posting here probably works, but if you would like ideas and help, a seperate thread may work better so you don't get lost among all the other comments.
But in both cases more info is needed, to give us an idea how it got to this point.
 
yes they did


No they didn't. Use the Waybackmachine. The lazy author of the article you posted clearly did not. The title of the article says "misinformation" in the quotes, and yet all he could do was point to a clause that has existed in the Acceptable Use Policy long before the attempt to include misinformation. Note the total absence of the word misinformation in the policy. This, on the other hand: "Provide false, inaccurate or misleading information;" is OBVIOUSLY a violation, such as if I say I am sending someone a knife, and send someone an empty box. That clause has been there as far back as 2016. The author of the article is - let me put it differently: mistaken.
 
Last edited:
PayPal
>> View all legal agreements
ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY
Download PDF
Last updated on November 3, 2022.
You are independently responsible for complying with all applicable laws in all of your
actions related to your use of PayPal's services, regardless of the purpose of the use. In
addition, you must adhere to the terms of this Acceptable Use Policy. Violation of this
Acceptable Use Policy constitutes a violation of the PayPal User Agreement and may
subject you to damages, including liquidated damages of $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per
violation, which may be debited directly from your PayPal account(s) as outlined in the
User Agreement (se

Here you go , pay-pals own words
 
There is no such things of my thread or your thread. A thread does not belong to anyone including the person who started it. As far as I see, navman navman post is perfectly fine here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top