I realize my previous posts in this thread were not well written but here's my point.
You may take some of the positive comments in this thread to be biased or coming from inexperienced collectors. Is that true? I don't know. Comments regarding loose shoelace wraps and comparisons to $12 knives seem just as biased at the other end of the spectrum, at least to me. Are complaints about loose handles common to his knives, off the table or from normal use? If I came across a Jerry Fisk knife with a scratched blade, without knowing if the damage occurred from cutting 1" branches or shearing corrugated aluminum, or even a user "touching it up" with sandpaper, I wouldn't say he makes scratched blades.
Also, would it benefit the community more to explain how and why his knives could be improved rather than be dismissive of the poster? We talk a lot about educating people new to custom knives, and some of the early posters did just that. Comments disparaging a maker's work and credibility should not be thrown about so lighty, IMO, but then maybe I'm not the only one being consistent.
BTW, I haven't owned or sold any of Phil's knives. The same with Jerry, I just used him as an example.