- Joined
- Oct 26, 2008
- Messages
- 516
I should have addressed this at the same time as J_Curd. I wasn't comparing them to a prybar, I was saying that per his requirements (crazy sharp, not overly large) the ZT line is a little overbuilt for his needs. I also thought you had mentioned the ZT300, not the 350 which is considerably lower priced. My apologies.
I'm not dictating, again, per his requirements I don't believe that a considerably large (wide) and overbuilt folder is correct. A Para, Caly3/ZDP, Leek/ZDP would be a better choice imo.
J_Curd believes for some reason that I am out to "get" and "disrespect" the entire lineup of Kershaw knives due to my opinions in a previous thread, thus the terse reply.
Which leads me to believe even more now that you didn't actually read my posts. Just saw Kershaw and ZT and instantly started bashing because it was being compared to a Spyderco.
I have said nothing bad about Spyderco or any of their knives. The Harpy and Captain are my 2 favorite Spyderco.
For edc, yes the 300 is over built. That thing is made for tough use.
The 0350, which I have already posted some of this, is not "overbuilt",
It has G10 scales and a liner lock. S30V blade with a DLC coating. The Para,
has G10 scales and a liner lock. Also has an S30V blade.
The Para has a blade length of 3 3/32" (81mm)
The 0350 has a blade length of 3-1/4 in (82.5mm)
The only difference between the 2 besides the DLC coating is blade and handle shape which accounts for the weight difference. Which is a little over 2oz. Para 3.75oz and 0350 at 5.8oz. (I was corrected earlier by harkamus. Thanks again.)
As per his requirements you keep repeating so much...
here they are again.
Considering this, the knife has to be :
-crazy sharp. This is an absolute must for me; as ridiculous as this may sound, a knife is supposed to cut stuff, and there's absolutely no way that the sharpness of the blade comes after anything.
-edge retention is important too, but i'd life either
*a very hard steel ( ZDP 189 comes to mind), that stays sharp very long. The sharpening is absolutely not a problem considering the fact that if the blade is actually tricky to sharpen, i'll make it sharpen by a professionnal once in a while.
*a reasonnably hard steel, that is both easy to sharpen and cut very well, even if the edge retention is not as good as harder steels. In that case i'll try to sharpen it myself.
-a folder knife, that feels and is very well built
-the size must be moderate ( although for this particular matter i'm way too much of a newbie to pop an actual lenght ). Let's say that the blade must be around 3"/8cm and i can go up to 4"/10cm
-the grip of the handle is not that important, although a nice looking handle is an obvious plus
-it must be easy to open, so either an assisted opening, or an automatic ( that are legal to buy where i live )
-finally, the budget is not really relevant, meaning i have not problem in putting 200/300$/ if i think the knife is actually worth it, the exact same way that i have absolutely no problem with the idea of buying a knife cheap. No snobbery here, i want a tool that works very well, not an object to show off.
I felt the handle of the 0350 fit his requirements nicely. As did the Para.
There are a few others I wanted to mention but I guess it is not worth it any more.
If you don't want people to think you are out to "get" and "disrespect" the entire lineup of Kershaw knives don't bad mouth them when they are compared to a Spyderco product. It is comments and attitudes like yours and a few others on this forum that make me not want to re up in October.