In my experience, the problem with Sebenzas has absolutely nothing to with the Sebenza itself, but rather the fanbase. It's the fact that it's so over hyped (and often viciously defended) by owners, that folks reading about them build up a mental image that they're the holy grail of knives. Then, when they decide to save up and drop the coin on one for themselves, they're a bit underwhelmed when they take it out of the box for the first time. It's a pocket knife. Nothing more, nothing less. The fit and finish are excellent, but so are the fit and finish on many of my less expensive knives. My latest Benchmade, a Kulgera is beautiful, and absolutely smooth as glass, not to mention super fast to open and razor sharp. Is it better than a Sebenza? Better at what? They both cut extremely well. They're both nice to look at, nice to hold, take up very little space in my pocket, are both very high quality, non-threatening around sheeple, etc. They're both quality pocket knives, but at different price points. With proper care and maintenance, they'll both last many many years and likely be passed along to my children when they get older if I'm not still using them. Hell, I still EDC my BM 943 that I've owned since it came out. It's still just as nice as the day I got it, but now with a few 'character' marks on it. All I'm saying is, a Sebenza is a great knife, but it's still just a knife. If the fanboys would quit building it up to be something it's not, and stop feeling like they have to attack anybody that questions one, things would be a lot better around here. JMHO.