*** TO TLC -- My apologies. This post was aimed squarely at 3Guardsmen, and the name mixup is purely mine. Sorry about that. ***
Alright, 3Guardsmen. I can't explain your hostility or why
you alone have reacted with so much anger and vitriol when every other poster has been helpful, not to mention more mature about their greater knowledge on the subject of heat-treating steel. But I know what I asked, and by pointing it out I'll explain it to you. The question I asked is this:
How about the non-Buck knives, say, the SMF's -- is it accurate to say that they ALL are heat-treated?
I also said that it was clear that some knives didn't get heat-treated, based on the following exerpt from Strider's link to BadLands.com:
When they (BUCK) made the move up to the new place, there was half a year with no heat treat.
That's an ambiguous statement. Does it mean that, for six months, no Buck Striders got heat-treated? Does it mean that for six months no Striders got heat treated? Am I expected to think that either one shut down for six months because there was no "heat treat" available? Whatever way one might presuppose, the statement is clear: There. Was. No. Heat. Treat. For. Half. A. Year. So, your statement to the effect that my question was totally unsubstantiated is only true in your mind.
At some point there, you characterized my post as a "slap in the face" of Paul Bos, and Buck Knives, et al. Feeling the need for a little safety in numbers? I'm guessing that Paul Bos, and Buck Knives, have more than enough maturity and self-esteem to let a statement, even if it's an erroneous conclusion based on a comment by Mick Strider on his website, either roll off their backs or use it as an impetus to clarify the statement in question. In fact, I'll bet they'll be happy to write to me, or post here somewhere, and clarify it as a response to our discussion, and I bet they'll be perfectly civil adults during the whole process. Which brings me to another point.
Can you explain to me why, out of the dozen or so posters here in this particular thread, you are the only one that has taken such offense to the original inquiry and been so condescendingly aggressive in your responses? Everyone else has been helpful, and many have commented on the offensiveness of your replies. It's as if you're taking this all very personally. Here's a hint: You want to spout your opinions everywhere, and then go barking after anyone that has an alternative opinion or doesn't have the background in the subject that you might (or might not, for that matter) have. Do you somehow think that 700+ posts gives you the right to shout down or ridicule someone else just because they're asking for answers you already think you know? I don't know how anyone could define immaturity without citing that as a prime example.
So what about your post is "stupid"? There's your answer. With work shown on scratch paper. <***** This part self-censored, because after a few hours it seemed a bit harsh. *****> Have a nice day!
Specialized