Charr
Platinum Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2013
- Messages
- 1,545
I'd like to hear more on why people don't like Greg or Medford knives. I've been eyeing one (the micro praetorian and the 187f) mostly because I think the knives look great and would take a beating and stand up to anything I throw at it for EDC purposes and otherwise.
Honestly, a knife does not need to LOOK like it can take a beating to be able to take a beating.
My Shirogorovs are built better than any other production knife I have ever handled, and they do not look overbuilt, aren't blocky, and they cut like hell (once I put a better edge bevel on them, I'll admit).
Not to mention I have seen several threads on here, and evidence from Shirogorov themselves, that shows the immense amount of abuse that the knives can actually take.
I might have seen other companies claim their knives are "tanks" or "overbuilt" but very few of those companies actually put their money where their mouth is and test their knives openly for durability. One exception is Cold Steel, who really does make probably the toughest folder on the market right now, and doesn't get the credit they deserve.
I don't like to buy a knife that is "overbuilt", but rather a knife that is "built well".
Knives will handle way more than we give them credit for, and way more than you will ever need them to in many cases, without being overly-thick, massive, overweight hunks of steel that are more suited to being used as a wedge than a cutting tool.
Medford have some interesting designs, but they definitely are not my cup of tea. They are a knife that isn't designed to cut...yeah, that's about all there is to it.












