Add another name folks!
I bought my Fang about a year ago (1095, Black-T) and absolutely adore it. I've yet to handle a Nealy MCS but as of now, the sheath system that came with my Fang is absolutely the most functional and efficient I've ever encountered. As to someone else's post regarding lengthening the handle on the Fang, if my understanding is correct, the reason for the abbreviated handle is that the knife is primarily intended for reverse-grip usage, in which case you want to keep your index finger loose anyway (in the interest of wrist flexibility). And in utility service, I've never found the handle to be even a slight problem. I've added a paracord wrap to the handle to give it a bit more bulk, and just tonight I reprofiled the edge to a sharper angle (personal preference, nothing more). So Bob, please, please, please continue making this wonderful knife. In the Bang-For-The-Buck category, the Fang outclasses anything else in my collection.
Regards -- Shades
I bought my Fang about a year ago (1095, Black-T) and absolutely adore it. I've yet to handle a Nealy MCS but as of now, the sheath system that came with my Fang is absolutely the most functional and efficient I've ever encountered. As to someone else's post regarding lengthening the handle on the Fang, if my understanding is correct, the reason for the abbreviated handle is that the knife is primarily intended for reverse-grip usage, in which case you want to keep your index finger loose anyway (in the interest of wrist flexibility). And in utility service, I've never found the handle to be even a slight problem. I've added a paracord wrap to the handle to give it a bit more bulk, and just tonight I reprofiled the edge to a sharper angle (personal preference, nothing more). So Bob, please, please, please continue making this wonderful knife. In the Bang-For-The-Buck category, the Fang outclasses anything else in my collection.
Regards -- Shades