- Joined
- Jun 8, 2005
- Messages
- 4,761
I'm doing way better financially than I could have anticipated a couple months ago and I'm considering one of these....a review is necessary. Espicially since I'm unfamiliar with CS anyway.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I'm not defending Cold Steel, but let me clear a couple of things up.Artfully Martial said:I'm kind of annoyed at how it seems like everything cold steel says about locks is that they're all the strongest in the world. But they're not the same genre of locks. The (lockback) on the sable is the strongest in the world, like the hamamoto (liner lock). That's illogical. They can't both be the strongest. And they developed neither. But they claim them like they're proprietary. Then on one of those two, I don't remember which, they say it's tougher than knives costing 3 or 4 times as much. That's a thousand dollar knife if we use the street price, as much as 1200+ on Cold Steel's website. Now, I've never seen a 1000 dollar production knife, and hope I never do, so I can't really confirm their claims. I guess I'm more concerned with (is it as tough as my 75 dollar D2 minigrip?)
LOL, It appears as though it is enough to bother everyone else.Artfully Martial said:Yeah, that's some stuff that does annoy me about CS. Not enough to seriously bother me though.
Come on guys, give me a black sable review!
Walking Man said:About the Hamamoto:
"Lock strength is absolutely critical in a knife like the Hatamoto, thats why we have equipped it with the most reliable leaf spring locking mechanism on the market. Made of Titanium and fitted to extremely close tolerances it has proven almost impervious to the stress and shock that would destroy a lesser knife costing even three or four times as much."
Again, they don't call it a liner or a walker lock, NO, it's their own special recipe.![]()
Also, the don't say it's the strongest here, just the most reliableon the market.
DngrRuss1 said:BTW- the Black Sable is NOT a ripoff of the Tighe knife- it is a combination of Pursian-knife style introduced by CS with the Scimitar and a modified Tanto tip- also introduced by CS.
By writing the above, it makes me question whether you're even viewing the same knives or just trying to get someone to argue with you. It's about as clear as deionized water that they stole this design.DngrRuss1 said:BTW- the Black Sable is NOT a ripoff of the Tighe knife- it is a combination of Pursian-knife style introduced by CS with the Scimitar and a modified Tanto tip- also introduced by CS.
There are several points that need to be clarified.DngrRuss1 said:If I remember correctly, the name Linerlock and Lockback are registered trademarks, while the basic type of lock mechanism is not. Patents often run out before trademarks do.
CS has taken the lockback, tuned it up and made it thier own, as well as the linerlock. Each is now extremely strong and under the names "rocker" and "leafspring".
BTW- the Black Sable is NOT a ripoff of the Tighe knife- it is a combination of Pursian-knife style introduced by CS with the Scimitar and a modified Tanto tip- also introduced by CS.
BuckyKatt said:Why should it be so surprising that one knife company copies another design? It happens all the time. Look at Gerber's new Evo, which is obviously a copy of CRK&T's M16 series.
If one compares the Scimitar and Black Sable, you see a curved blade and a curved handle on each... and again, I'm sorry, but that's where the resemblance ends. You can't possibly be claiming that the Black Sable is more similar to the Scimitar than it is to Brian Tighe's design. If you are, then I can't wait to see where this thread goes.
DngrRuss1 said:Funny how when other knife companies have similiar designs, the term is "copy", when it's CS, the term is "rip-off".
Why do you continue to argue when some very respected and knowledgable forumites have told you that this is clearly a RIP-OFF!!! Or a copy or whatever. You are entitled to your opinion but, you really need to quit doing this:DngrRuss1 said:It's all too easy to throw out terms like "rip-off" without doing the slightest bit of research beyond first impressions.