Got nothing better to do so I'd like to make two points re: the direction this post is taking. Not directed at anyone in particular, by the way (he says defensively, expecting someone to take personal exception and fire back with both barrels). One, I remember quite a few comments some time back, basically, "deals not done til both sides are happy." Curious if happy is limited to, "I'm happy things are literally as described" or the more general, "I'm happy with the whole deal." Does happy include changing your mind after an "I'll take it," or once you commit are you in til the end? Always seem to be circumstances in folks' lives that can change a deal before it's done...health, job, birth/death...better deal. I understand the frustration of a lost deal and subsequent lost opportunities and it seems someone is always backing out for one reason or another...but, seems to be one of those things barterers and traders are going to have to live with/tolerate. That is unless someone establishes/enforces rules to the contrary. From what I can see, that ain't gonna happen (and rightly so) here at BF. My second point is the difference between 'must' and 'should'. I think most folks will agree the latter is relatively objective, given our culture, etc. A guy 'should' honor a deal when he says, "I'll take it." Reality is, unless it's a 'must,' some folks won't. What a guy should do ain't always what he's gonna do...I think we gotta accept some of that instead of continually flogging a dead wagon puller. Therefore, the only zero tolerance should be something having to do with a Busse. That said, I think it's fair to beat the hell out of the repeat offenders!