Codger_64
Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2004
- Messages
- 62,324
I am chomping at the bit to use the passaround SPK, but so far no deer have come to my hoist since receiving the knife. Hopefully this will happen in the next few days. Meanwhile all I can do is a mini-review of my first in-hand impression of the knife.
Since I consider the knife to be a custom improvement over the Schrade Sharpfinger, a knife with which I have been familiar for many years, I began by comparing their size. I had somehow envisioned the SPK as being a bit larger than the Sharpfinger, but it is not. While the SPK is by no means a copy in shape or proportions, the sizeing is almost the same in all dimensions. This is a good thing for me. One of the features which has made the 152 so useful to me is the fact that it is so compact. A longer blade or longer handle would reduce it's utility to me, if only slightly. I like that the butt of the handle ends in my palm, not beyond it in normal grip. It's roundness makes it a comfortable fit there and seems like it would remain comfortable when used to push the blade foreward, as does the 152.
Astheticly, there is no comparison between the two. Compared to the pedestrian workhorse 152, the SPK is a work of visual art in it's details, and in the executiion of those details. The handle cover contours are pleasing to the eye, yet quite functional feeling. The hamon adds interest to the relatively flat blade surface and the nicely etched maker's marks, sized and placed as they are, in no way detract from the overall look of the blade. The differences in the fore and aft finger/thumb groves on the spine are a bit visually distracting on first examination, but form may well follow function with them. I would not want larger grooves in the thumb ramp, but I may not want smaller ones in the foreward position. I won't know this until I am able to use it sufficiently.
Today is cold and foggy so There may be some hunting success before sundown. Deer have been feeding and moving at night with the current noon phase and the mast is still plentiful, as well as browse, so there isn't much pressure for them to do a lot of daytime feeding.
Michael
Since I consider the knife to be a custom improvement over the Schrade Sharpfinger, a knife with which I have been familiar for many years, I began by comparing their size. I had somehow envisioned the SPK as being a bit larger than the Sharpfinger, but it is not. While the SPK is by no means a copy in shape or proportions, the sizeing is almost the same in all dimensions. This is a good thing for me. One of the features which has made the 152 so useful to me is the fact that it is so compact. A longer blade or longer handle would reduce it's utility to me, if only slightly. I like that the butt of the handle ends in my palm, not beyond it in normal grip. It's roundness makes it a comfortable fit there and seems like it would remain comfortable when used to push the blade foreward, as does the 152.
Astheticly, there is no comparison between the two. Compared to the pedestrian workhorse 152, the SPK is a work of visual art in it's details, and in the executiion of those details. The handle cover contours are pleasing to the eye, yet quite functional feeling. The hamon adds interest to the relatively flat blade surface and the nicely etched maker's marks, sized and placed as they are, in no way detract from the overall look of the blade. The differences in the fore and aft finger/thumb groves on the spine are a bit visually distracting on first examination, but form may well follow function with them. I would not want larger grooves in the thumb ramp, but I may not want smaller ones in the foreward position. I won't know this until I am able to use it sufficiently.
Today is cold and foggy so There may be some hunting success before sundown. Deer have been feeding and moving at night with the current noon phase and the mast is still plentiful, as well as browse, so there isn't much pressure for them to do a lot of daytime feeding.
Michael