Schatt Morgan, Queen and GEC

ddallam

BANNED
Gold Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2020
Messages
347
Can anyone tell me if and which Schatt & Morgan patterns and Queen patterns have been manufactured by GEC? I purchased a S&M Heritage Series 1193 that is almost indistinguishable from my 151213 GEC. I know Queen bought S&M and GEC bought Queen, but does/did GEC do SFOs under the S&M brand?
 
Last edited:
Can anyone tell me if and which Schatt & Morgan patterns and Queen patterns have been manufactured by GEC? I purchased a S&M Heritage Series 1193 that is almost indistinguishable from my 151213 GEC. I know Queen bought S&M and GEC bought Queen, but does/did GEC do SFOs under the S&M brand?


Zero. And what you know needs a little work :D
GEC has never participated, had ownership, nor made knives for Queen (any brand).
 
I'm no expert, especially when it comes to Queen Cutlery.
I don't believe GEC has ever owned the Queen brand.
Bill Howard, the owner of GEC, used to work for Queen Cutlery.
So Bill was involved in making Queen knives for a period.
 
And they would probably be more than a bit insulted if they knew you thought they made anything from the Heritage series. That was the beginning of the end for Queen.

Bill left Queen in 2006 and started GEC with Ken Daniels. Bill sent Ken packing a few years later and he went down the street and bought Queen - then took them into bankruptcy.

So a lot of interconnects; but the two companies have not had a friendly relationship since Bill left. And their quality completely went over the edge when Bill left (or Bill left because...).
 
Interesting. And thank you. I fully trust your expertise. Yet at least for this one knife the quality is indistinguishable. Flawless ebony/bolster transitions, good W&T, no blade play. Guess some good knives came through as their end began. Must be from the first series. So Queen produced the Heritage series under the S&M brand. Sorry for my limited knowledge: sure don’t want to insult Bill. Guess my confusion derives from GEC’s acquisition of Queen mfg assets.
 
Last edited:
Yet at least for this one knife the quality is indistinguishable. Flawless ebony/bolster transitions, good W&T, no blade play. Guess some good knives came through as their end began.

Queen did make some good knives but from what I have seen, it was when Bill Howard was working there. If you find a Queen made sometime in the late 90's to 2005 or so it might be a keeper.

 
I have a Queen produced S&M trapper that was made in 2007 and can’t find a thing wrong with it.
 
Interesting. And thank you. I fully trust your expertise. Yet at least for this one knife the quality is indistinguishable. Flawless ebony/bolster transitions, good W&T, no blade play. Guess some good knives came through as their end began. Must be from the first series. So Queen produced the Heritage series under the S&M brand. Sorry for my limited knowledge: sure don’t want to insult Bill. Guess my confusion derives from GEC’s acquisition of Queen mfg assets.

Queen made some outstanding knives. And the Heritage series were good knives but on most samples you had to overlook gaps, poorly finished blades / edges, and quite a few pin cracks / flattened pins. Glad you got a good one.

BTW, GEC did not acquire any Queen assets to my knowledge.
 
Queen did make some good knives but from what I have seen, it was when Bill Howard was working there. If you find a Queen made sometime in the late 90's to 2005 or so it might be a keeper.

Winchester reproductions, Case Classics, MooreMaker, etc. etc. During the late 1980's and most of the 1990's - nobody made a better slipjoint (imo).
 
Thanks yet again. I thought I had read somewhere that Bill bought the manufacturing equipment from Queen, but I probably read that wrong. I guess I'm very lucky to have happened upon a knife that I could put up against any of my GECs, but only have about eight.
 
Gotta be careful not to suggest Bill Howard was the only good worker and knife designer employed by Queen and any good knife they ever made was made by him personally.

I was under the impression he was the master cutler or something of that nature at about that time at Queen. No, he didn't make them all by hand himself but I imagine his presence had a lot to do with the higher quality.
 
Interesting. And thank you. I fully trust your expertise. Yet at least for this one knife the quality is indistinguishable. Flawless ebony/bolster transitions, good W&T, no blade play. Guess some good knives came through as their end began. Must be from the first series. So Queen produced the Heritage series under the S&M brand. Sorry for my limited knowledge: sure don’t want to insult Bill. Guess my confusion derives from GEC’s acquisition of Queen mfg assets.

From what I understand two former employees bought out S&M which they used to form Queen almost 100 years ago , and S&M was 100% a product of Queen cutlery till the day they closed their doors.
 
There is a lot of info about it, has to be one of the most discussed cutlery business topics around (compared to say, the ownership of Bear and Sons)

https://www.chuckhawks.com/queen_cutlery.html

Unfortunately the discussion in the last few years has distilled this complicated history into the idea that Queen was good when Bill was there, bad when he left, and that’s all there is to it. Although we are lucky to have Bill and what he has done at GEC, it may not be that simple a proposition. For example, Queen made a variety of niche traditional knives in more advanced steels that some traditional knife users really appreciate. It may be too early to pass judgment until a few more decades have gone by.
 
Unfortunately the discussion in the last few years has distilled this complicated history into the idea that Queen was good when Bill was there, bad when he left
I believe Mike said that it started its downhill slide when Daniels took over.
Seems more like a management issue rather than a problem with the cutlers.
 
I have owned quite a few Queen made knives from the 1990s through about 2014. The decline in their quality didn't happen immediately after Bill left in 2006, but a gradual decline began a few years after that. By about 2012 or '13 their knives became pretty "iffy" to buy sight unseen.
 
I appreciate that there was a decline in Queen’s quality control. I also believe that Queen knives weren’t as uniformly good as GEC in design/aesthetics. But... its not all about gaps in the liners! I am no cutler but running a cutlery business has to be more than maintaining QC. Queen’s QC was only one part of their business.

Queen had been around longer and had older patterns. Older boxes. Legacy issues. Probably a good few knife designs hanging around from the 70s-90s that badly needed a refresh. The design of the fixed blade pictured in the article I linked is a perfect example of a dated design. I can’t believe they were trying to sell that knife in 2016 (btw I have one and I love it!).

So, let’s be a bit kinder to Queen than we have, gotta be careful we don’t turn QC into a beast that kills off the delivery line. If that hasn’t happened already.
 
I believe Mike said that it started its downhill slide when Daniels took over.
Seems more like a management issue rather than a problem with the cutlers.

Some statements of my opinion, but commonly shared among the community.

Queen / S&M have made good knives for a long time and has a great history as a cutlery manufacturer.
The resurgence of the brands came in the 1980's with the Winchester reproductions and other work done on contract.
The market share grew thru the 1990's with Case Classics, Moore Makers, Bulldog, and finally in the later part of the decade with their branded products.
By 2000 Queen was making one of the best slipjoints in the U.S.
In 2008 quality started to slip and although there were rays of light - it continued to slip until the company entered bankruptcy.
Bill was at Queen in the 1980's, 1990's and early 2000's. He left his upper management position in 2006 to start GEC.

Since most of this story is a couple decades old - I am fairly comfortable that we can start forming opinions.
I have never made the conclusion as to whether Bill left because the quality was in decline or if the quality declined due to Bill leaving. Maybe Bill is a malicious competitor and sabotaged Queen as he was leaving to eliminate the competition (I don't subscribe to this idea that I just made up; but want to cover all the bases). Or maybe, none of the above - just coincidences.

Now, a couple items not everyone knows. After Bill left Queen the company went into chaos. As one of their larger dealers - I could not even get in touch with the sales staff; much less get product onto my shelves. Once the Daniel's family bought the company they seemed to get production volume back up quickly. After they had been in charge for a year or so a couple of dealers (that were very close to Ken) kept touting how great the new products were - so it seemed as if maybe the quality was improving and I placed a 5 digit order with them. In hindsight it was probably more like Damone on Fast Times at Ridgemont High: wherever you are at is the best place to be; whatever you are doing is the best thing to be doing. Dealers don't sell a lot by saying, "this thousands of dollars worth of knives I just got in is seriously lacking in fit/finish". When the products arrived, they were so inconsistent that I had to start putting them on my website in a "graded" fashion and tiered pricing. A (no issues, good action), B(slight issues), C(issues but mostly cosmetic or repairable), and D(shouldn't have left the factory). Ken had told me they were not taking back small issues from dealers; but took offense to my new methodology to protect my customers and sent me a letter stating I was no longer the type of dealer they wanted. I had already sent back a lot of knives for obvious defects and had a balance at the factory for thousands of dollars. I told Ken that I agreed with his assessment and needed my factory credit repaid. It took months to get my money back. But other dealers had much bigger credits at the factory that were completely lost after the bankruptcy. I would frequently check in with other dealers about current Queen products; but the main one was KSF. They ended up having to give away Queen made barlows with a larger purchase because the quality was so bad. I also knew a middle manager at SMKW near the end of the Daniel's ownership that told me personally they had ceased all purchases from Queen. Also talked to a large distributor that purchased directly from Blue Ridge Knives things that didn't necessarily go out to everyone. He said they bought Queen seconds off a pallet in the warehouse at BRK - and there were several pallets. So, I don't think a little QC miss here and there was the issue.

Regarding the Heritage series specifically. I was exciting for them, but had already seen a couple glimpses of a lack of quality control. They made a line of "economy" Queen City knives that were actually a good value for the money. But my cost was in the $20-30's; so minor issues were overlooked (smashed pins, small gaps, etc.). When I received the first Heritage knives there were a lot of gaps around shields, in liners, blade grinds were very uneven, etc. This was a marked decline from what they have been producing in the past. I felt a bit like since the economy series was a hit; the new management decided this would be a way to save money on all production. I had a long conversation with Jennie (upper management at the time) and the gist of her response was that this would be the new norm.

So, there was good and bad. I am not deriving my information or opinions from stories I read or second hand information. I am basing it on dealings I have had directly and indirectly with Queen management and products for over 30 years. A product that I was crazy about for over a decade and was one of their top purchasing dealers.
 
Some statements of my opinion, but commonly shared among the community.

Queen / S&M have made good knives for a long time and has a great history as a cutlery manufacturer.
The resurgence of the brands came in the 1980's with the Winchester reproductions and other work done on contract.
The market share grew thru the 1990's with Case Classics, Moore Makers, Bulldog, and finally in the later part of the decade with their branded products.
By 2000 Queen was making one of the best slipjoints in the U.S.
In 2008 quality started to slip and although there were rays of light - it continued to slip until the company entered bankruptcy.
Bill was at Queen in the 1980's, 1990's and early 2000's. He left his upper management position in 2006 to start GEC.

Since most of this story is a couple decades old - I am fairly comfortable that we can start forming opinions.
I have never made the conclusion as to whether Bill left because the quality was in decline or if the quality declined due to Bill leaving. Maybe Bill is a malicious competitor and sabotaged Queen as he was leaving to eliminate the competition (I don't subscribe to this idea that I just made up; but want to cover all the bases). Or maybe, none of the above - just coincidences.

Now, a couple items not everyone knows. After Bill left Queen the company went into chaos. As one of their larger dealers - I could not even get in touch with the sales staff; much less get product onto my shelves. Once the Daniel's family bought the company they seemed to get production volume back up quickly. After they had been in charge for a year or so a couple of dealers (that were very close to Ken) kept touting how great the new products were - so it seemed as if maybe the quality was improving and I placed a 5 digit order with them. In hindsight it was probably more like Damone on Fast Times at Ridgemont High: wherever you are at is the best place to be; whatever you are doing is the best thing to be doing. Dealers don't sell a lot by saying, "this thousands of dollars worth of knives I just got in is seriously lacking in fit/finish". When the products arrived, they were so inconsistent that I had to start putting them on my website in a "graded" fashion and tiered pricing. A (no issues, good action), B(slight issues), C(issues but mostly cosmetic or repairable), and D(shouldn't have left the factory). Ken had told me they were not taking back small issues from dealers; but took offense to my new methodology to protect my customers and sent me a letter stating I was no longer the type of dealer they wanted. I had already sent back a lot of knives for obvious defects and had a balance at the factory for thousands of dollars. I told Ken that I agreed with his assessment and needed my factory credit repaid. It took months to get my money back. But other dealers had much bigger credits at the factory that were completely lost after the bankruptcy. I would frequently check in with other dealers about current Queen products; but the main one was KSF. They ended up having to give away Queen made barlows with a larger purchase because the quality was so bad. I also knew a middle manager at SMKW near the end of the Daniel's ownership that told me personally they had ceased all purchases from Queen. Also talked to a large distributor that purchased directly from Blue Ridge Knives things that didn't necessarily go out to everyone. He said they bought Queen seconds off a pallet in the warehouse at BRK - and there were several pallets. So, I don't think a little QC miss here and there was the issue.

Regarding the Heritage series specifically. I was exciting for them, but had already seen a couple glimpses of a lack of quality control. They made a line of "economy" Queen City knives that were actually a good value for the money. But my cost was in the $20-30's; so minor issues were overlooked (smashed pins, small gaps, etc.). When I received the first Heritage knives there were a lot of gaps around shields, in liners, blade grinds were very uneven, etc. This was a marked decline from what they have been producing in the past. I felt a bit like since the economy series was a hit; the new management decided this would be a way to save money on all production. I had a long conversation with Jennie (upper management at the time) and the gist of her response was that this would be the new norm.

So, there was good and bad. I am not deriving my information or opinions from stories I read or second hand information. I am basing it on dealings I have had directly and indirectly with Queen management and products for over 30 years. A product that I was crazy about for over a decade and was one of their top purchasing dealers.

Yeah I remember those heritage knives, I bought all of mine from ya! God the blade to handle ratio drove me nuts.
 
Some statements of my opinion, but commonly shared among the community.

Queen / S&M have made good knives for a long time and has a great history as a cutlery manufacturer.
The resurgence of the brands came in the 1980's with the Winchester reproductions and other work done on contract.
The market share grew thru the 1990's with Case Classics, Moore Makers, Bulldog, and finally in the later part of the decade with their branded products.
By 2000 Queen was making one of the best slipjoints in the U.S.
In 2008 quality started to slip and although there were rays of light - it continued to slip until the company entered bankruptcy.
Bill was at Queen in the 1980's, 1990's and early 2000's. He left his upper management position in 2006 to start GEC.

Since most of this story is a couple decades old - I am fairly comfortable that we can start forming opinions.
I have never made the conclusion as to whether Bill left because the quality was in decline or if the quality declined due to Bill leaving. Maybe Bill is a malicious competitor and sabotaged Queen as he was leaving to eliminate the competition (I don't subscribe to this idea that I just made up; but want to cover all the bases). Or maybe, none of the above - just coincidences.

Now, a couple items not everyone knows. After Bill left Queen the company went into chaos. As one of their larger dealers - I could not even get in touch with the sales staff; much less get product onto my shelves. Once the Daniel's family bought the company they seemed to get production volume back up quickly. After they had been in charge for a year or so a couple of dealers (that were very close to Ken) kept touting how great the new products were - so it seemed as if maybe the quality was improving and I placed a 5 digit order with them. In hindsight it was probably more like Damone on Fast Times at Ridgemont High: wherever you are at is the best place to be; whatever you are doing is the best thing to be doing. Dealers don't sell a lot by saying, "this thousands of dollars worth of knives I just got in is seriously lacking in fit/finish". When the products arrived, they were so inconsistent that I had to start putting them on my website in a "graded" fashion and tiered pricing. A (no issues, good action), B(slight issues), C(issues but mostly cosmetic or repairable), and D(shouldn't have left the factory). Ken had told me they were not taking back small issues from dealers; but took offense to my new methodology to protect my customers and sent me a letter stating I was no longer the type of dealer they wanted. I had already sent back a lot of knives for obvious defects and had a balance at the factory for thousands of dollars. I told Ken that I agreed with his assessment and needed my factory credit repaid. It took months to get my money back. But other dealers had much bigger credits at the factory that were completely lost after the bankruptcy. I would frequently check in with other dealers about current Queen products; but the main one was KSF. They ended up having to give away Queen made barlows with a larger purchase because the quality was so bad. I also knew a middle manager at SMKW near the end of the Daniel's ownership that told me personally they had ceased all purchases from Queen. Also talked to a large distributor that purchased directly from Blue Ridge Knives things that didn't necessarily go out to everyone. He said they bought Queen seconds off a pallet in the warehouse at BRK - and there were several pallets. So, I don't think a little QC miss here and there was the issue.

Regarding the Heritage series specifically. I was exciting for them, but had already seen a couple glimpses of a lack of quality control. They made a line of "economy" Queen City knives that were actually a good value for the money. But my cost was in the $20-30's; so minor issues were overlooked (smashed pins, small gaps, etc.). When I received the first Heritage knives there were a lot of gaps around shields, in liners, blade grinds were very uneven, etc. This was a marked decline from what they have been producing in the past. I felt a bit like since the economy series was a hit; the new management decided this would be a way to save money on all production. I had a long conversation with Jennie (upper management at the time) and the gist of her response was that this would be the new norm.

So, there was good and bad. I am not deriving my information or opinions from stories I read or second hand information. I am basing it on dealings I have had directly and indirectly with Queen management and products for over 30 years. A product that I was crazy about for over a decade and was one of their top purchasing dealers.

Wow. Thanks for taking the time to share all of that. Wonderful insight. I've run two companies in my career and have battled some of these same kinds of issues. I'm gal to learn all of this, and respect you for sharing it.
 
Back
Top