i think because they feel that a ring has no practical use on a knife (this is what they mean to outlaw :foot and plus, it is hard to explain as a tool too.
It doesn't matter whether it's offensive or defensive. Here's the definition from Section 12020(c)(7) of the California Penal Code:
Whether or not a Scotch Dispenser meets the definition is something you can test at your own risk. If I were the judge, I'd say it doesn't because it's not worn for purposes of offense or defense and its not made for striking a blow, but I'm not the judge.
I question the Ca. legality because of the ring. I don't know about the double edged law, let's just say it's a single edged kerambit for legal purposes. Couldn't you use it strike a blow in the reverse grip. Not that you would, but couldn't you?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.