- Joined
- Oct 30, 2002
- Messages
- 3,974
Same to you, bud! Keep your eyes/ears open down there in border country.
--nathan
--nathan
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
But your statement that one must be superior to another to earn the right comment on any shortcomings is not exactly so. The child did not need to strip naked to prove the emperor had no clothes.
I think that if we leave either Art or sound mechanics out of knifemaking our final product suffers in the end..
What is it do you consider "Art" in a knife(honest question). Is it purely astetic, and a physical apperance? I personally see art in how effectively an object functions, and while I can totally appreciate an "art knife" from a craftsmanship angle I am so much more concerned with mechanical function ie; ergos, geometry, HT aspects, versitility, task performance.
A handforged, damascus blade, hilt, and pommel, w/ a mammoth ivory handle, inlayed w/ tortoise shell and abalone, w/ brass titanium and damascus spacers, and a handstiched, basket weave, snakeskin inlayed sheath is very beautiful to look at. But when I come across a monsterous looking chopper that can chop through a hardwood, not crack/break, still hold an edge, produce no shock in the handle while chopping or batoning, and is so well balanced that it performs small tasks like a knife 1/3 its size, that is art to me.
Dave,
HT, function and performance can also be considered part of the art of knifemaking. I think often aesthetics and art get confused. Aesthetics is a branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of beauty. Art generally deals with aesthetics, but is not necessarily limited to it.
That being said, I have no problem with a non functional art knife being called a knife.
There can be great artistic merit in the simplest of things... a chair, a hammer, even a pair of chopsticks... if they are designed well and achieve the design goals.
I think people get too hung up on words like "art" and "function" and fail to understand they aren't mutually exclusive. Each represents a continuum, and the two continua overlap in many places. Even if you focus all attention on making something as functional as possible, there are aspects of art in that form.
Art is not a dirty word.
There has always been a bit of a divide between, fine art, commercial art, industrial art etc..
Design is generally considered part of art.
To a large degree art is in the mind of the beholder/creator. Its' a hard thing to define to everyone's liking,… but we know it when we see it.
Generally speaking art is a form of human communication.
I think the most widely accepted way to learn about art is to study art history... AND practice art first hand.![]()
Discussions go awry when folks make unsupported claims or speak in absolutes...... This happens everyday. Don't ask for links.![]()
I like looking at art... but studying it in depth hurts my brain.
over 85% of all statistics are made up on the spot. :victorious:
personally i don't mind beening criticized. and i have been criticized many times here and there...i remember several times i take it too personal, lost my temper and blow up like a little kid too. but one thing i am certain is i have been learning and improving a lot from the criticizing i received. a good argurment sometimes worth weeks of research because it bring in fresh new thoughts from different sight of view. eventrully i learnt to ingore the harsh words but to take the good points from them. but, do not ever criticize me having a big nose, or i will...