I posted this in the
Photography Forum. I'll include it here, because it holds value to this thread, too.
Primary: Lighting
Secondary: Layout
Tertiary: Camera
OK, allow me to help clarify why I chose these in this order.
First off here is a look at my indoor studio setup. (I use a similar setup at shows.)
It has a large translucent diffuser: Draftsman's Velum (acetate tracing paper), and I have (2) powerful 400ws strobes with 150w incandescent modeling lights (always on). I surround my subjects with mirrors, but the enclosure lets plenty of light 'spill off'.
Here is an example of how subtle positioning of lights can make a BIG difference in the output.
Something as reflective as this shiny folder really needs the lighting off from the sides, else you would 'blow it out'.
What we enjoy showing in blades are the accurate grinds. Here is where you have to go carefully: One size NEVER fits all when it comes to light positioning.
Lastly, I have the benefit of using one of the most advanced DSLR's in the world: The
Canon EOS-5D MKII
That said, just to show how well you can work the simplest cameras, I kept the lighting the same and simply switched to my pocket digicam and changed the settings on it to suit:
It's apparent the colors on the upper shot, corrected through the camera and editing software, are not as accurate or pleasing as the lower one. That probably would have been closer, had I used a true 5500k daylight set of bulbs. Nor did I use a tripod, which, at this slow setting, would have netted even more crisp detail.
But without question, the shot itself without a comparison stands clear and displays nicely.
Camera quality is a distant third.
Coop