should i buy a buck 110?

k. I just got one today, Wow. I really am surprized at how solid this knife is built. I thought it would be a little different than it actually is. cant believe i didn't get it sooner. lol.

Congratulations on your purchase! If you haven't figured it out yet, Buck will warranty their knives for any problem you may have, short of beating it up with a hammer.

Now you must look up your local chapter of Buck Anon. As has been said, you can't have just one. :D

I say that in jest, but if you are a hunter, never hurts to have an extra along.

That knife will be passed down to your Grandchildren and their children. Let your kids go buy their own.. :rolleyes::D
 
k. I just got one today, Wow. I really am suprized at how solid this knife is built. I thought it would be a little different than it actually is. cant believe i didnt get it sooner. lol.

They're wonderful, aren't they?

I pocket carry mine about once a month just because. Realistically, I only use it on weekends and out hunting - places where the size of the clip blade won't cause a stink. So, it's not really in my EDC rotation. But as others have said, it's THE folding hunter.

Regarding the 420HC, it's worth noting that steel nuts generally report that Buck's heat treatment process of the 420HC is the big differentiator. It's just amazing that you can get a knife that good made in the US for that price.
 
Yes. I've owned one for almost 40 years and would put it on my top five "must have" list. :thumbup:

Agreed, and that "must have list" ain't just for knives alone. It would cover anything and everything.

Glad you picked one up Legenda. We all knew you were gonna love it.
 
Used my 110 to field dress a nice doe this morning. That's two deer this season, small game, fish, pumpkin carving, steak/veggie cutting at camp, and the 420hc is still going strong on the factory edge.
 
Last edited:
I'm not American (Australian) & I don't hunt, I fish. I think that anybody who has the slightest interest in knives must own a Buck 110. It's a piece of engineering history.
 
This thread is what makes the Buck sub-forum great.

Instead of a bunch of sarcastic or insulting comments, everyone posted positive, encouraging opinions. Awesome! :D
 
It took me years to but a Buck 110, but when I did, I realised I should have got one years earlier!!! Now I have several and they are wonderful USA made knives at a great price!!!
 
All too funny.

This question was like asking the pastor if you should come to church on Sunday.

:D

Right on, brother.

About the only reason not to buy a 110 that I can think of is if clip blades really put you off. I know personally I prefer spear blades and I don't think Buck will ever have anything but a big clip in their 110's. Having said that, I also own a 110 with the red paperstone scales, a 110 with the cowbone scales, and a factory blemish Boone and Crocket with the maple burl (?) scales (someone put the nail nicks and stamp on the wrong side of the blade and made it left-handed. Gee, guess who's left-handed?). One day I'll shell out for a nice custom scaled one with nickle silver bolsters and then I'll probably be done with the 110.

You would have a hard time going bad with a 110 unless you didn't buy it from Buck.
 
No, I dont think you should get a Buck 110.



























You should get many:D

110s010.jpg
 
Funny, I read this thread and responded on Friday. After hearing so many wax poetic about the 110, I got mine and fondled it for a while, then slipped it into the horizontal carry mode on my belt. Later on that evening my wife dragged me (not really) along to a little gathering at our local independent bookstore. Somebody was trying to slice some nice VT cheddar with a butter knife so I offered to do it with the 110. A few minutes went by when an "older than even me" guy walked up and said: "Aha, a real Buck knife. Thought so." When I complimented him on the good guess he clarified that he knew it when he heard "that distinctive snap" when I opened it up.

The 110 is an American icon. I've had mine out now since the weekend. Dressed a deer as well with my Bucklite version (like the reduced weight and ease of cleaning these days, as well as the blaze orange handles). Got me thinking that I'll pick up a standard 110 as a last minute Christmas present for my son who will be home from college for the holidays.
 
Right on, brother.

About the only reason not to buy a 110 that I can think of is if clip blades really put you off. I know personally I prefer spear blades and I don't think Buck will ever have anything but a big clip in their 110's. Having said that, I also own a 110 with the red paperstone scales, a 110 with the cowbone scales, and a factory blemish Boone and Crocket with the maple burl (?) scales (someone put the nail nicks and stamp on the wrong side of the blade and made it left-handed. Gee, guess who's left-handed?). One day I'll shell out for a nice custom scaled one with nickle silver bolsters and then I'll probably be done with the 110.

You would have a hard time going bad with a 110 unless you didn't buy it from Buck.

They weren't spear points but Buck made at least a couple of 110's with drop point blades. One was for BCCI club members and one a limited edition Alaskan Statehood that used a 426 blade. Their short lived production linerlock 110 also had a drop point blade.

PaperstoneClub110a.jpg


AlaskanStatehooda.jpg


LLc.jpg
 
They weren't spear points but Buck made at least a couple of 110's with drop point blades. One was for BCCI club members and one a limited edition Alaskan Statehood that used a 426 blade. Their short lived production linerlock 110 also had a drop point blade.

PaperstoneClub110a.jpg

Oh my gosh, that knife is just stunning. I LOVE that blade shape. Do I understand from the image name that the handle is made out of paperstone?

My old 2 dot 110 is in my pocket today. I use it on weekend and days I'm working out of my house.

I do find that the size and shape of the clip blade is off-putting for around town and office use. Perhaps if I were living back in VT again it would be different. (sigh)

buck110.jpg


The softened bolsters made a massive difference in the pocket carry. Hopefully Santa will bring me a Duke this year.
 
I know the 110 has an almost cult like following, and I have one myself that my dad passed on to me after he passed. I don't carry it, for sentimental reasons only, but guys, I honestly have to say here, whats the hype all about? I'm not knocking it at all, but I just don't understand why they're so revered? I'm not trying to stirr up a flame war here, I guess I just don't understand.
 
Smitty,

I think the 110 can be considered in 3 ways: as a user for rough work, as a collectible, and as an EDC knife. I'll take them in order...

Rough Work User - Today, in our modern times, the tactical folder has become the ubiquitous rough work knife. Look around and you'll see the tell tale sign of a pocket clip all around you, especially among tradesmen. But all of this happened after the Buck 110. The Buck 110 was the first locking folder that had the umph (<-highly technical term) of a fixed blade. With the Buck 110, for the first time you had the strength of a fixed blade knife with the convenient carry of a folder. The 110 is just as capable today for rough work as when it was introduced. It's a bit heavy compared to others and has the clip blade of it's hunting heritage, but for rough stuff, it's still a viable knife. Add to that, when you carry it, as opposed to a more generic tactical folder, you're carrying the original rough stuff folder. For some folks, that matters. For others, not so much. A YMMV things to be sure.

As A Collectible - The 110 is an icon. It just is. It's why people call a Schrade Uncle Henry LB7 a "Buck Knife" even when it's a Schrade.

EDC Use - I don't work in the trades and no longer live in a rural enough setting to be able to use the 110 for EDC use. I know people who do, and that's great. But I find the 110 is just a bit too big for EDC use and the clip blade just a bit too off putting to most suburban and urban sensibilities. Again, this is YMMV territory.

So, in terms of not getting it, I think it depends which way you're looking at it. I can make a lot of sense for some things, but I agree with you, it doesn't make sense for others.
 
So, in essence, what you're saying is that it IS a capable enough knife, albeit with it's inferiorities compared to tadays modern folders, but the real "hype" is really more about nostalgia than anyhhing else? I can certainly respect that, I'm more of a traditional folder kind of guy myself, but I can respect it nonetheless. By the way, what is YMMV?
 
I am not big on the standard 110, but I really like Custom Shop 110s. Go figure. If you like the pattern, get it. You also have the 112 as an option.
 
whats the hype all about? I'm not knocking it at all, but I just don't understand why they're so revered?

After nearly 50 years of production, I don't think "hype" would be the right word. "Proven" seems to best describe the most copied knife in the world...ever.
 
I know the 110 has an almost cult like following, and I have one myself that my dad passed on to me after he passed. I don't carry it, for sentimental reasons only, but guys, I honestly have to say here, whats the hype all about? I'm not knocking it at all, but I just don't understand why they're so revered? I'm not trying to stirr up a flame war here, I guess I just don't understand.

If it has to be explained to you, then you probably wouldn't understand anyway. ;)
 
So, in essence, what you're saying is that it IS a capable enough knife, albeit with it's inferiorities compared to tadays modern folders, but the real "hype" is really more about nostalgia than anyhhing else? I can certainly respect that, I'm more of a traditional folder kind of guy myself, but I can respect it nonetheless. By the way, what is YMMV?

The 110 is certainly different in substantial ways from the modern tactical, but I wouldn't say that the 110 is inferior in any way.

Or, better to say that the benefits of the differences are better understood in terms of what sort of cutting need you're facing. Different cutting needs will favor one over the other.

The 110 was designed as and still is a hunting knife. This explains the use of a hollow ground clip point blade and explains it's heft in terms of weight. Much of that weight comes from the weight of the heavy durable bolsters and heavy, more secure lock back design. It was designed for holster carry where the expectation was for a slow, deliberate open/close.

In contrast, modern tactical folders are designed with the intended use of some combination of fighting (or looking scary), rescue (cutting strapping) and general utility work, which explains the use of drop points and (often) the use of partially serrated edges. The don't need to stand up to the types of twisting and prying that a fixed blade can do and that 110 gets as close to as any folder ever made. So, modern tacticals can be made lighter. They also typically have a less secure locking mechanism. And of course, modern tacticals are made with the assumption that pocket carry and one handed deployment is preferred, hence the use of thumb studs, opening assists and pocket clips.

These aren't advantages or disadvantages. If you're going to clean a deer (or pretend that you might, as one guy noted) then the 110 is going to be a better knife.

IMO, the connection between the 2 designs is that prior to the 110 which proved that a locking folder could be durable, it wouldn't have been possible to think of the modern tactical folder. Well, I guess you could have but I suspect they would have ended up looking more like the older French and Spanish fighting knifes (lighter weight) and would have been less useful as utility knives for tradesmen.
 
Back
Top