The next morning....
Things are still bleak. I'm not going to have my friend put down before exploring all other options. I'm willing to do what it takes to keep him alive, and preferrably with us, but it's going to be a long hard road with assessments, training, etc. There's no doubt in my mind he deserves a second chance, whether or not that second chance could be given in a quiet suburban neighborhood remains to be seen. Can you train a lab not to fetch? a collie not to herd the children? sometimes yes, sometimes......
My wife will have a huge say in the matter, since I spend half to three quarters of my time on the North Slope. obviously, a protective dog is good in these circumstances. a dog that the wife or kid can't control....that would be a different story.
We're starting out, with hardware solutions, fences, doorlocks, etc. but of course do not intend to rely on such, and will delve into some serious training if it's an option. (Remember, the state itself may remove that option)
If other options fail, I'll do everything I can to find a good home for him, although people that are willing to take in "pitbull-ish" dogs with an attack history are kind of scarce.
Jessie is a 75lb unknown terrier that we adopted as a stray. I'd never say he was a Pitbull due to the fact that our homeowners insurance wouldn't cover us with him.
Turns out my son didn't open the door for a stranger, but was coming back in from dumping a pot of bean juice in the woods. He had just opened the door to come in when Mr. End of the world was coming into the yard. It turns out to have been a case of supremely horrible timing. In the real world, unfortunately these things sometimes happen.
Ironically, I've been thinking of "Mice and Men" since the incident occurred.
Whatever happens, I will tell my son.
In Alaska "Beware of Dog" signs are a big no-no. It acknowledges that you have a vicious dog on premises. a "No Trespassing" sign however, covers you quite well in that once you DO trespass, it is at your own peril.
I still can't figure whether it was a protective instinct or something else. The pragmatic repercussions are the same either way. He clearly wasn't deadset on ripping out the guys throat or anything, otherwise he would have. He also acted outside of his training, and against my commands for the first time. (he went around me a couple times to get at the guy) In the meantime, I can only judge on what I've seen. It's absolutely insipid to even remotely suggest the guy had ill intentions unless I've witnessed evidence otherwise, which I haven't. And believe me, I've looked hard. (kinda suspicious of door to door end of the world pamphlet givers from the start)
He's nothing but wonderful with friends and family, but a risk with anyone else he doesn't know or isn't introduced to.
In the past two occurrences I'd mentioned, he was not punished, but rewarded.
Financial liability is a consideration, but plays a secondary role to morality. I just can't have a dog that's going to rip out sweet old Mrs.Hannah's throat when she's halfway in the yard with a freshbaked pie because he thought she was going to hurt the family.
In any case, I'm not killing having him put down unless there is no other option.
I'll write more as time allows, but...it's going to be a wild day.
I can't thank y'all enough for the well wishes, prayers, and input. Well...most of ya' anyways....you know who you are...
