Where it gets trickier is when you compare a sprint run or similar to these "mid techs". For instance, my ti/g10 Millie compared to a CRK.
So, $200 versus $400, but in this case the cheaper one actually has "better" steel (or at least "higher end" steel, better is subjective), and the same materials used, with minor differences....
I think the only thing you can put on paper that the CRK has "better" is the pivot system? Even still, the Millie opens very smoothly, it's barely a difference. Maybe you could count the decorative embellishments on the CRK Ti handle, too...?
This thing has all the traits of a mid tech and beyond, with just about the only thing you can put a finger on about "inferior" fit and finish is that one line of jimping was cut unevenly... Is that enough to want to spend double on a lesser performing knife? Not for me.
When people talk about the precision of a CRK being in the thousandths of an inch, I feel like that is purely in their head, because in a knife I truly think you can not observe this difference with our limited sense of sight and touch. I truly believe if they compared a typical ti frame lock spyderco, or other production folder, to a "mid tech" with an objective, unbiased eye they would not be able to quantify the mid tech as better...
lockup. (notice that crooked jimping? the horror!)
better materials on the CRK? Not in my opinion.
When it comes down to it, Ti is soft, so give it a couple weeks and both will have some dings and scratches, making that infinitesimal level of f&f even less noticeable. And blades will be scratched and sharpened and dirty...