daizee
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2009
- Messages
- 11,130
Double post--FTR-not my opinions just what Ive heard ppl say. I am all for our advancement but at the same time I dont want anyone losing their jobs because of it. Theres not enough of those to go around as it is.
I think the size of our (USA) country is under-recognized. pulling underground lines through various topography, across mountains, through rocky New England (ha!) is non-trivial. I can't dig in a 3-foot radius without hitting a rock - and it might be the size of a house. All those classic stone walls? those stones came out of the ground when the fields were cleared - just the surface, mind you. and it's in these areas where there are also lots of trees that are hard to maintain also because of the topography. So you're kinda screwed one way or another.
Now when you've got a highly developed urban area it's more possible. NYC is a great example. Of course in sandy all the electrical tunnels got flooded, so there are risks either way. But not every city is built on a complex of tunnels. FWIW, I hate looking at overhead lines, but plumbing the planetary surface for wiring isn't like plumbing a house. And when things DO go wrong they're very difficult and expensive to debug. Similarly, adding capacity or new technology is difficult with things underground. My FIOS hookup was a non-event. With underground cabling in 50-year-old conduit? yeeks.