Springs are not made to cycle faster than the steel can inherently handle.
Repeated fast cycling (flipping) causes premature breakage which is neither the manufacturers or the parts fault , but the fault of the user. Which is user error. Kershaw steps up a lot and replaces many, many parts that they just don't have to, kudos to them for that. But it still doesn't make it right.
I think one of us may be confused.
When you flick a knife open you are exerting force on the blade to pivot, AIDING the spring's tension. Wouldn't that actually reduce the tension on the spring it self since the spring's potential energy is not being used to it's fullest?
Also as far as springs are concerned don't you think if you took the
spring out of the knife and you compressed it and when you let it flex back to it's original form it would be a lot faster than the knife could possible open even with one flicking it?
Lastly before you mention the tension of the blade suddenly stopping, most of that if not all of that energy is being transferred to the blade stop not the spring.
Never heard of a spring failing prematurely because of accelerated use, I have of course heard of springs failing because they were flexed way past their specs but not because they were "aided" thus reducing tension. I am quite sure at this price point, it should last 10,000 openings with no problems.
To give an idea how good springs can get: An automatic watch doing 8 beats per second or around 28,800 beats per hour has a spring flexing at that frequency.
In one day that's 691,200 times a day with a tolerance of around .03% (accounting for 30 seconds @8 beats a second gain or loss or mean/day of variance).
That watch when properly oiled can last approximately 4 years give or take before needing maintenance.
That's about 1,009,152,000 times in that four year period without breaking. Plus after servicing, I am sure it could last another decade with ease. This is of course the product of a very ridiculous R&D budget and probably in the extreme of "springs".