So what is the measure of sharpness to go by?

All that talk about having to go to universities that have million dollar equipment when all you're saying is a thinner blade cuts better.
A dull razor blade will out cut a sharp chopper because its thinner, not because it's sharper. We all know that.

What are you saying about measuring sharpness ?

I think what he was talking about is the actual apex width.

The thinner that is the sharper the edge will be, and that can actually be measured, usually in nano meters.
 
Most peoples knives are dull. Not many keep razor sharp edges including most knife people. I blade check a lot of customers, friends, family and co workers. So far, no one had a hair whittling edge. Just excuses haha.

On average I'd say if it cuts printer paper clean its sharp enough.

For me, sharp is when the hair "pops" off when shaving. Also clean cutting phone book paper to check how consistent the whole edge is without snaging.

The effort put in to keep a tool at such sharpness is a waste of time for most. I use and strop my blades everyday. It's quite obnoxious to the average person. If many knew how much time I put into knives they might think I'm autistic hahahaha.
 
Typically, the word "sharp" is used to describe the ease of cutting. There is nothing magical about a blade; it has a geometry that can be quantified and that geometry determines the perceived "sharpness." What complicates this, is that the geometry should be matched to the cutting task. For example, a straight razor edge is destroyed by a single cut through a piece of paper.

I would suggest that our perception of sharpness can be attributed to two aspects of knife geometry; the width of the apex (I think best described by the word "keenness") and the thickness of the blade behind the apex (which can be measured at various distances from the edge). I sharpening, we typically first set the geometry of the blade behind the apex - eg thinning a knife from the factory grind to a thinner grind. And second, set the geometry of the apex. The relative importance of these two parameters will depend on the material being cut.

Most of this discussion of "sharpness" is really describing what I call "keenness" - the last micron of the blade. Keenness is responsible for the ability to cut paper or grab fingerprints, shave or tree-top hair, etc. The apex may not be uniform, a property sometimes described as "toothy" but this is still a property of the last micron of the edge.
 
Same, I press the edge against my finger, catch on the ridges. Thin paper is always an easy test. I'm trying to not do hair shaving tests anymore. A knife has to be insanely sharp to cut TP as your holding it up!
 
All of this "width of the apex" stuff is an approximation, unless edges hit a minimum weidth, then go to zero width instantaneously. Which they don't.

In reality one chooses a distance away ads close as they can to the apex (whereever that is) and measures the width of the blade there, based on the precision of their instruments. As Ankerson noted.

And/or one measures the rate the width increases as it goes away from the apex. That's the edge angle.

All of which, as I said earlier, is much more complicated than proton's cockamamie gross oversimplication.
 
Sharp enough for me is being able to fairly easily and cleanly slice through thin magazine paper. It's not the ultimate level of sharpness by any means, but it's pretty damn sharp.

I don't do "arm shaving" tests, because who wants weird bald patches on their arms?

The paper slicing is about what I do as far as "sharp goes". Choose another area so your weird bald patches don't show.
 
All of this "width of the apex" stuff is an approximation, unless edges hit a minimum weidth, then go to zero width instantaneously. Which they don't.
...



All measurements have uncertainties; however, the width of the apex can be measured with sufficient precision to quantify the keenness required for shaving or tree-topping or push-cutting paper. Of course, it is not necessary to measure the apex width, since we can easily test whether the blade meets the keenness thresholds for those tasks.

keen_straight_edge01.jpg
 
I like the bite that a slightly coarse edge has.

Grey spyderco ceramic is perfect. I think 600 grit. Nasty bite, still shaves and slices paper.
 
The paper slicing is about what I do as far as "sharp goes". Choose another area so your weird bald patches don't show.

What other area? Upper thigh? Do I have to take my pants off to test the sharpness of my knife???
 
After a full day of using a knife I have 3 or so tests.

1) Can it shave?
2) Cut paper?
3) Does it catch on a sharper or finger nail.

If it doesn't pass all three it gets 5-10 passes per side on the strop. That usually fixes it right up to my standards.
 
not even close. in theory the narrowest point is infinity minus 1 unit of some nameless prefixed meter.

Infinity minus 1? Well sorry to burst your bubble, but infinity minus/plus/divided/multiplied by anything is still... Infinity!

I have no idea what point you were trying to make...
 
What other area? Upper thigh? Do I have to take my pants off to test the sharpness of my knife???

Whatever floats your boat? :D

If you can cut your finger without really feeling the cut, it's sharp enough.

Actually, I think hair popping sharpness is over blown. It is fun of course. But I tend to like a slightly toothy edge on a knife that I use all the time for EDC stuff. For skinning or meat prep, hair popping is the way to go.
 
I'm happy when it cuts cleanly through phone book paper or the equivalent of. Without catching anywhere along the length of blades apex, and it does so in a consistent manner.
 
Im reading alot that factory sharp is in fact not sharp. I thought my Benchmades were very sharp but I am mistaken lol. What is "sharp"?

Depends on the type of knife, but factory sharp when talking Spyderco and Benchmade is extremely sharp. Same goes for my Cold Steel folders. You should be able to easily push slice through paper like it isn't even there. If you have to draw slice it isn't as sharp as it could be in a small thin blade.
 
All measurements have uncertainties; however, the width of the apex can be measured with sufficient precision to quantify the keenness required for shaving or tree-topping or push-cutting paper. Of course, it is not necessary to measure the apex width, since we can easily test whether the blade meets the keenness thresholds for those tasks.

keen_straight_edge01.jpg

Best knife edge picture ever!
I look at my apex at 100 power with a Meiji microscope.I always wanted to see the view at electron microscope level.Thank you!

The ultimate blade would be a smart alloy which always presented a single row of atoms at the apex...resharpening as it is used like the liquid terminator!
Imagine how crazy that would be!
 
Best knife edge picture ever!
I look at my apex at 100 power with a Meiji microscope.I always wanted to see the view at electron microscope level.Thank you!

The ultimate blade would be a smart alloy which always presented a single row of atoms at the apex...resharpening as it is used like the liquid terminator!
Imagine how crazy that would be!

What if you want a toothy edge? :D

I guess you can enter the menu and change the settings. :D
 
Another thing I do, as a chef.

I place a 12" x 12" square of saran/plastic wrap on my cutting board as carefully and neatly as I can.

I'll make cuts into without wrinkling or moving the plastic wrap whatsoever. Like cutting a pizza.

On my sharpest days, i can criss cross into another cut. Most days the already cut part of the plastic will ride on my blade.
 
That really is a cool ass picture of a knife blade.
Could you turn the blade horizontally so we can see a shot of the length of the blade?
And a regular shot of the blade with a normal camera so we can see the subject blade in normal scale?
I really want to see the micro serrations everyone speaks of that gets bent over causing the 'dulling'.
Can you tell I'm a mechanical engineer getting his yayas over microscopic metallurgical imaging?
 
Back
Top