- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 71,156
You nailed it, Robert
Yes, I thought that was a very good post :thumbup:
Interesting discussion folks :thumbup:
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
You nailed it, Robert
I think the Daniels care about their product more than the previous owners of Queen, I'm rooting for them.
Agree. But then, not every feels like they have to agree with us, right? A couple of vendors I have bought from (like Knifeworks, but not the same vendor I bought the knife I referenced from) told me they simply ship waaaaay too many knives to look at them before they go out.
I owe the current ownership of Queen nothing. To extend the fact that I didn't work out the knife situation with them to your specifications being tantamount to slighting the traditional knife community is absurd. Queen should be responsible for their own manufacturing protocols and techniques or they will fail.
Take a look at car manufacturers. How many have had the idea of collaborative quality control? How many repeat buyers do you get when you are putting out an inferior product? Think of all the failed brands... it applies to all industry. People buy products based on expectation of quality, not with their fingers crossed that they won't have to do a lot follow up to make things right. I bought 9 - 10 knives from that same vendor, and three of the knives were problematic. One took a pair of pliers to get open (literally, as I couldn't get the pick to seat well enough to pry it open), one was a Dan Burke Barlow that had nippers used to cut the pins and were left sharp enough to cut my hands (sent back - I figured if I filed and polished the pins it would void the warranty, was informed by vendor I was correct), and the last one I had problems with, the round bolstered stockman with the pathetic spring.
I understand that not all manufactured goods are the maker's best efforts. It comes with having employees, and I can accept that from myself as well. But when you have a 30% failure rate, I can't find an excuse for that. I have heard them, too. Mostly insulting excuses, but they are there. I am a contractor, but I started out my company on fine carpentry work, and that is what built my business. Like any other proud craftsman, I am completely insulted when someone says "you need to expect problems since there is so much hand work involved". Hand work, building by hand, etc., used to be a promise of quality, not an excuse for second rate goods.
I don't know if you have your own business or not, but I have for a little over 30 years. You are incorrect in your assumption that quality control is a cooperative, collaborative effort. All responsibility for me, my employees, and any subcontrators I use all fall directly on my shoulders to deliver the quality of product I promise when I sign a contract. I don't expect my clients (nor do I know of any successful businesses that do) to be involved in what amounts to daily running of my business to ensure that I turn out a quality product. They pay me to turn out a finished product they cannot. My name is on the door, the 10 - 20 guys on the job work for me under my supervision, and the buck stops with me. Period. I don't shirk any responsibility for any aspect of my company.
Quality control is not a collaborative effort, or a goal setting exercise between client and company. Quality control is the sole responsibility of the manufacturer (or service provider) and customer service is the result of unmet goals or expectations, or to resolve the occasional mistake or poor quality end product that happens now and then.
Perhaps you should consider too, that when I called Queen at the suggestion of the vendor, they told me that there really wasn't anything they could do for a weak spring on a knife. So back to the vendor I go, with his prediction I would get a knife with a different problem. That being said, if I had known that the spring would get even weaker, I would have sent it back, hard feelings or not.
Lest this get too preachy, you should know as well that the vendor is a well respected contributor to this sub forum, a good guy, and I trust his judgement. I have bought several knives from him. Some had annoying problems, nothing serious, and one he even fixed himself and sent back. Personally speaking, I was glad that he told me that with the stock he had on hand I could wind up with a worse specimen of that model from Queen instead of just slapping a box in the mail with another knife using so I could see if the next one was better. When he told me that something else would likely be wrong, I took him at his word.
First, I never said I would only buy old stock. You are either making false assumptions or have juxtaposed my post with someone else's.
Second, in fact I never said I would buy anymore Queen products. I said "no more Queens for now".
I trust the folks in this sub forum and their candid reporting on their experiences with vendors, manfacturers and end products. That is the real value of this community for me; unvarnished, truthful reporting of facts and experiences. I won't be sending the current owners of Queen any money so they can keep experimenting and trying to "get it right". According to their own bios, they have all been in the knife production business well long enough to get their product right, which to me makes it even a little less excusable for them to put out a poor product. A couple of Queens I have now are the best fit an best finished knives I own, and with their D2, I rarely looked at other knives for purchase. When I start seeing reports here on BF from happy customers that they have reversed things, I will likely be interested in Queen again.
Robert
They didn't start using D2 until 2002, so if that tang stamp means 1989, then no, it's not D2. Judging by the lack of patina, unless you buffed it, I'm guessing that's some variety of stainless? I assume the black stuff on the blade is just grunge.
http://www.queencutlery.com/1989.php
http://www.queencutlery.com/uploads/Model_70__7-12-2014.pdf
Ken Daniels is pure gold. I would not bet against him. He loves, loves, loves pocket knives and is committed to turning that ship around.![]()
Derrick, Who is Ken Daniels in the knife community, or should I say what is his history with knives?
I'd love a Queen barlow. One was my first knife from my grandfather 62 years ago.
It's what got me started on a lifetime of collecting.
What is Mike Latham's Collector Knives URL?
OK, found Mike's site, but alas no barlows in sight :-(
Thanks
Rich
So, someone associated with Queen left to be part of GEC years ago , and is now back and a key player at Queen?
So maybe quality suffered partly due to talent loss?
And so maybe now things will improve?
I've gotta say "maybe" a lot since we're on a forum.
But that would make sense.
Maybe.
So, am I anywhere near on track here?
I don't know how many workers followed Bill from Queen; but my personal opinion is that it was more of the mentality that left than the people that caused the slide.
Let me know when they get straightened out and their quality is good. I want to by a Queen someday.![]()
Thanks for the clarification guy.Not really
Bill Howard was a principal at Queen pre-2007 and left to start GEC. One of his good customers and friends was Ken Daniels; whom started GEC with him. When Bill bought Ken out of GEC, Ken purchased Queen (which was struggling). I don't know how many workers followed Bill from Queen; but my personal opinion is that it was more of the mentality that left than the people that caused the slide.
The Indian River Jacks are the best I have seen. They are still not to the level of GEC, but close.
Queen is willing to use different steels, GEC is not.