Daniel Koster said:
He did mention being able to cut 1" rope 400 times....that is repeatable and worthy of respect.
Boye cut 3000 pieces of one inch hemp a long time ago with one of his stainless blades, with the Basic line, Busse has done 2771 cuts live at Blade, and showed shaving ability up to 2500 cuts, and was still cuting paper really well when they ran out of rope, the Swamp Rat line cuts massive amounts as well, not to mention the full INFI line.
Ed Fowler says he can do the same with his 5160 knives, and up to 1000 cuts with his 52100 knives.
Fowler cuts 3/8", one strand, Boye and Busse cut the full roll. You also need some measure of sharpness or you can cut essentially any amount of rope. Goddard used to measure the force required, so does Wilson, he cuts on a scale and compares the various steels he uses, he also does multiple runs to check consistency.
I used a D2 blade to cut 2045 slices of 3/8" on a two inch draw on a cutting board with a 10 lbs increase in force during the cuts. I also screwed it up because I got sloppy on the last thousand and was pressing too hard and cutting up the cutting board, only a 5 lbs increase in force was required through the first thousand cuts.
Note as well that blunting is a non linear process so if you relax your sharpness standards just a little, you can easily double the amount of rope cut, this can be extended indefinately.
munk said:
So, not really a valid test for a Khuk.
The first two you could do as the media is so thin it will only see the edge. For the last it would be difficult to get a thick blade through the leather, do it with a 20"+ Ang Khola and I would be hell for impressed.
In regards to the tape holding it on though, take a piece of leather and cut it with a really sharp knife with a very thin and acute edge and you will see that the force required is minimal, so tape could hold it, some tape is also stronger than others and the surface of the leather makes a large difference as well.
The problem with these tests is that they are not sensible for juding sharpness because they are too much involved with luck and user skill to judge the edge consistently, you could easily get a sharper blade with higher cutting ability fail because of the user, they however are impressive on that respect for the part of the user.
They also of course test one aspect, for a complete profile you test the opposite which is edge durability the counterpart to sharpness and cutting ability.
I got a custom parang made some years back, I was happily cutting some brush around some trees I needed to fall when I wanged the blade right into a large rock. High quality steel with enough thickness at the edge for durability and it just impacted a little, no chipping, no primary grind damage.
That blade would never pass the leather cut however it has nothing to do with sharpness, it gets sharp enough, the profile is simply not thin enough however to pass through the leather, plus it has the wrong profile, for that you would want a convex arc like on the Valiant goloks, this one is concave.
Here is a shot of the Jungle Honey for those curious :
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=28332
-Cliff