"a lock is a lock"
So you'll be first in line to buy the new Spyderco featuring the Opinel twist lock?
I had considered explaining my reference "boring back/mid lock but that post was already turning into a novel and I thought it would be self explanatory what I meant. For starters when I see a back lock knife it always reminds me of a Buck 110. Certainly a great knife with a proven lock but it just seems old and outdated at this point. The other part of "boring" is the number of mid locks in Spydercos lineup, especially looking at their Japanese offerings. Variety in the spice of life ya know?!
I'll through my reasons for not having a preference for mid locks in here in hopes to not being accused of only using my Spydercos for tactical knife flicking;
1) Same reason I dislike liner and frame locks: to release the lock one handed your fingers have to be in the path of the blade. I think most here probably put rediculously sharp edges on their knives as I do and know even light contact with the blade when closing can do serious harm.
2) Many mid/back locks end up with "lock rock" in time and there is no good way to remove it. Newer lock designs have engagement surfaces that are tapered so as they wear the lock moves up the taper and stays tight.
3) The cutout in the blade tang that the lockbar snaps into can get filled with lint, dirt, & debris to the point the lockbar will not engage fully. Most other locks do not have such a pocket to trap debris and push it out of the way instead of packing it like a mid lock.
4) Last and most important, the tactical flick! Seriously though I do flick my knives open when I use them and I like a lock that I can disengage the lock and gravity allows the blade to fall shut. No I dont do it this way to be tacticool but rather because its faster, more convenient, and safer (not putting fingers in the blades path).
So when are we getting the folding whale rescue with deep carry wire clip, red g10, and super blue steel?!?!?