I have started thinking recently i may be misunderstanding the fear of radiant heat, and i think your post sort of confirms it. I can see in HT ovens where temp can change 100 degrees very fast, temp swings from radiant heat can be a problem. But the toaster oven does take a long time, comparatively, to begin heating the space, so maybe it just isnt a big deal for toaster ovens.
I've read some of what I think has probably helped to contribute to that concern, and while I think it may be a mild factor at austenizing temps in a high powered 220V furnace, with elements very close to the work piece, I still think it's massively overblown. Decarb at those temps is a much more real problem, that possible grain/overheating issues. Most steels can easily survive sustained times at several hundreds of degrees higher or more, during forging or forge welding, and all it takes to bring those concerns back in order, is a bit of care and consideration. Even if the exposed surfaces momentarily peak a few hundred degrees above temp (an extreme example), conduction is mitigating that, otherwise TCs would be evening out to much higher temps. If hypothetically the last few thou on the exposed edges are getting overheated in the steel, it's irrelevant, because you'll already be dealing with decarb that has to be ground away, unless you're austizing out of a salt pot or similar, with controlled, conductive media, where IR heat spikes can't be an issue. Regardless, even further, austenizing temps are "sweet spot" targets, balanced with times at those temps, designed in broad strokes, for general equipment baselines.
Many steels will respond better higher temps with super short soaks, in the case of simpler alloys, like W2, or lower temps with much longer soaks, in the case of many more complex alloys.
All this to say, don't sweat that shit you read. It wasn't invalid information, just blown out of proportion, because of tunnel vision.
If you really want to add a baseline of certainty, get a hardness tester. That'll at least tell you if you're hitting max potential RC with your austenizing temps, and the appropriate subsequent RC with the "by the numbers" tempering temps. It won't guarantee grain size or the homogeneity of the steel structure, but there are other ways to test that. Assuming you're leaving enough material to clean up any potential decarb made during that process, you'll have nothing to worry about from any hypothetical IR based or other temp swings that don't show on the instruments, manifesting in the work.
In the case of the source material I suspect you've been reading, I recall they were talking about tempering in a 220V HT furnace, and were seeing momentary spikes when using more sensitive equipment. It's a valid concern, but I still think conduction of the steel takes care of it, assuming you don't have wonky equipment. In that case also, the concern was IR based spikes from direct LOS of the elements, but still, if you're tempering after austenizing, you're going to remove any material that may have theoretically gotten significantly hotter for a fraction of a second, and regardless, it's temperature *and* time, that ultimately determines the temper.