Most of the changes appear to be very well thought out, but that's what they are
changes to an existing design.
The tip is interesting, and I like what they did with the guard, choil, and the E-handles, except they (handles) look too wide. Should have kept the tubular fasteners, though.
I'm sure the mystery steel with a 3-day heat treat, the general shape, the sizes offered, silly names, and the logo are all sheer coincidence

Already, there's a claim that these are in-house designs. Please!
That's just too corny for me to take seriously. Especially the steel. You don't pull a new steel (new to me, anybody heard of this stuff?) and a proprietary heat treat out of your rear.
Some good ideas, but they sure aren't very original. I can't see people paying Busse prices for no-name knives with unproven performance.
Who cares about them making these Busse-esque knives? They're just knives. Ergo handles, drop point blades, crinkle finishes...none of this stuff is new or original. Some people think Strider should sue anyone that makes a tanto with a bead blast finish. 'Course some people are retarded, too.
Making them is one thing. Saying they're a new design is another.
LMAO, first thing that came to mind when I saw them was the Smith&Wesson Sigma. 'nuff said.
Still, I'd like to try one
