08-08-1999, 07:20 PM
Walt Welch
Basic Member Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Alamo, CA, USA
Posts: 1,838
Hey, wait a minute! Don't anybody move. Look at this thread, 'What is INFI.'
http://www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum12/HTML/000691.html
Here is a post which gives the elemental analysis of INFI:
Quote:
E T
Member posted 30 July 1999 02:07 PM
I had the INFI steel analyzed and its' composition is as follows:
Ti-0.2%
V-0.42%
Cr-7.7%
Fe-88%
Ni-.94%
Mo-1.33%
The carbon content can't be determined by the method used.
Mike Turber indicates that this analysis is accurate, admittedly somewhat indirectly. He also indicates that the mere elemental composition does not hold the secret of INFI:
Quote:
Mike Turber
Administrator posted 30 July 1999 09:00 PM
The anaylisis (sic) does not show how it is made only the ingredients. No propritary (sic) info is lost. I know how it is made and no secrets have been devuldged (sic) in the post above.
------------------
Best Regards,
Mike Turber
BladeForums Site Owner and Administrator
Do it! Do it right! Do it right NOW!
www.wowinc.com
Then Tim Zowada makes this startling post, indicating that the heat treatment is NOT the secret part:
Quote:
Tim Zowada
Member posted 05 August 1999 11:39 AM INFI is proprietary in both analysis and manufacture. It isn't like any thing I've ever seen before. The heat treat is pretty straight forward, if you have the right equipment. It really is a fantastic steel. If I didn't make my living making Damascus, I would use it in all my knives.
That's all I can say for now, or Jerry will cut my tongue out and fingers off!
Tim Zowada
Now, putting this all together, a casual glance at INFI's composition reveals a rather low alloy steel, far from the high tech steels to which Tom Carey referred. The only mild surprise is the 0.2% Ti. It seems unlikely to me that this much Ti could account for mystical properties. Ti-Fe alloys are fairly common, as a few minutes on Principal Metals website will reveal:
http://www.principalmetals.com/
So, I am really confused now. Tom Carey, please tell me; since this INFI stuff appears to me to be a rather mundane low alloy steel, how can it have such amazing properties; especially since at least one poster indicates that the heat treatment isn't anything special. Why did you include it among the high tech steels, such as CPM, when it is anything but high tech.
As I mentioned in my previous post, vanadium levels above 4% are more easily achieved through CPM methodology. This stuff only has 0.42%, which cannot make enough vanadium carbides to profoundly affect the steel, IMHO. Remember that even the rather common M2 has 2% vanadium, and that the substantial difference between M2 and M4 comes by doubling the vanadium content. The other elements are present in concentrations considered to be substandard, or marginal at best. I mean, jeez; a Mo of 1.33%!
The thing that makes BG-42 so excellent is the presence of 4% molybdenum, 1.2% vanadium, and 14% chrome. It would seem that all you need to do to make INFI the equal of BG-42 is triple the Mo and V, and double the chrome. This does not seem the thing one would have to do to a super steel. I would not, on the basis of this information, call INFI high tech, or similar to CPM.
This puzzles me greatly. If this steel is really as good as it is said to be, then there must be a revolutionary process here. Simple elemental analysis doesn't suggest any special properties, and the heat treatment seems to not be magical either.
I am not saying the steel is NOT special, capable of wonderful, startling feats. What I am saying is I do not understand WHY this would be the case, given the composition and the fact that alloys similar to this have been around for many years.
I welcome any comments, criticisms, or questions; further, I welcome anyone who can reduce my confusion regarding this alloy.
Respectfully submitted, Walt
Obviously I have not mastered UBB code; sorry for not putting Principal Metals URL in a hyperlink. WW
[This message has been edited by Walt Welch (edited 08 August 1999).]
[This message has been edited by Spark (edited 08 August 1999).]