Well, gentlemen, I HATE flying, so doubt that I will be participating in any airport experiments. If I can find a friendly security guard at some location, however, I can test some metal objects.
The problem that I forsee is that there are so many variables that I doubt valid conclusions can be made.
One misconception is that it is the mass of the conducive object that makes it detectable. This is not the case. The shape of the object is far more critical. The surface area of the object is also important, since eddy currents tend to form on the surface of objects ('skin effect'). The orientation of the object is also important. Furthermore, the speed of the object going through the magnetic field greatly affects the detectability. The placement of the object relative to the loop of the detector is critical as well; the magnetic field generated by the object's eddy currents is inversely proportional to the cube of the distance from the detector. The sensitivity of the detector is also obviously important. Most are set rather low, so that an object must generate large eddy currents to be detected. This is to prevent the large number of false alarms caused by turning the sensitivity up.
One other consideration is that some metal detectors are designed to detect ONLY ferromagnetism. See this site:
http://www.detection.com/Security/
Another misconception is that the wand detectors are more sensitive than the walk through (portal) detectors. They are not; they are more specific at localizing the source of the magnetic signal. A high quality wand detector will detect a small steel handgun at 7" to 10"; a pocket knife at 6"; a steel key ring at 5", a razor blade at 3", and a hat pin at 1".
Coug; the devices used about 10 to 20 years ago were actually MADs (Magnetic Anomaly Detectors); their use today is to detect submarines from aircraft; the actual detection is accomplished by the minute change (anomaly) caused by the mass of metal on the earth's magnetic field.
I hope that I have not bored you too much. All that I was trying to accomplish in my first post was to dissuade anyone from thinking they could sneak a Talonite (r) blade through a detector. Perhaps you can, perhaps you cannot. As other posters have most cogently pointed out, this is a good way to irritate security if you are caught.
Walt