- Joined
- Apr 4, 2007
- Messages
- 8,578
Well I read this whole thread and just want to throw my .02 into the mix.
In regards to ZT with their limited editions I think the price hike is actually pretty fair. I think they saw the crazy prices their LEs were fetching and basically wanted more of the profit to go to them instead of secondary market sellers. I personally think this is totally justified, I would rather pay a markup to the people making the item I like than some flipper just trying to make a quick buck.
Spyderco I think might be testing the waters. The high end knife market seems to be pretty huge right now, with a lot of people willing to spend a lot of money. Guys like Brous and Medford have proven this. Spyderco is a company, and companies are always trying to maximize profit, that's just business, I don't begrudge them. Overall they make great products at all different price points, so if they want to try out the higher end stuff and see if sticks, I'm not opposed. Now if we start to see price increases across the board on their products (like benchmade for example) well then I will probably stop buying from them.
Perhaps we are at a transitioning period in the knife industry. I can't say for sure but, I would imagine that this industry is bigger than it ever has been. Companies know there is a lot of money to be made, so they're trying to carve out their piece. I think we need to play it by ear as consumers, if you feel a knife is overpriced, or the quality of a brand is no longer there, then vote with your wallet and don't buy it. Prices will eventually normalize as they always do, and that sometimes means an overall increase, its just how these things work. Or its also possible that we are in a bubble phase and headed towards a collapse (I'm referring solely to knife market), god knows we've seen enough of that in recent years. Only time will tell.
I personally would rather not pay a markup at all. For me If I was making knives and i saw dealers selling them for 3-4 times my MSRP I would also stop selling to the dealers for gouging customers. But I would not mistake the desperation that some customers would succumb to when paying that much for my product with my product actually now being worth that much money. And since I would be eliminating the middle man and no longer need to sell at dealer cost I would still be increasing my profit margins if I sold the knives direct to customers at the prices the honest dealers would sell for. That would have been a win win. The customers are guaranteed the best price by default and the manufacturer would actually make more money than had they sold them to dealers. Dont get me wrong, I understand why they are doing it. If you figure that they increased their profit by $100 by cutting out the middleman on each knife and they only produced about 200 knives you are talking about $20,000 they pocketed on that run of knives since they didnt have to sell them to dealers. I just think at the very least they could have offered a coupon code or maybe even a buy our expensive knife and get this lower cost knife that isnt selling well for free. Something to show that the customer still matters. Because from where I am sitting and not having any real insider information? When a company cuts out the dealers and sells direct to the consumer but at MSRP? The only conclusion I come to is greed. I dont want to feel that way but it is what it is.