I don’t remember them being that way at all, the CF inlay on both sides looks pretty good on that one @Lapedog
Learn something new every day.
I think KAI went after them because they owned the patent for the older style attachment.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
I don’t remember them being that way at all, the CF inlay on both sides looks pretty good on that one @Lapedog
Learn something new every day.
I think KAI went after them because they owned the patent for the older style attachment.
I do wonder why it seems to be only showing up on the newer model Socoms with the external lockbar attachment.
Has anybody seen these marks on other aluminum bodied MicroTechs?
I had never seen these tooling marks on any of MT’s older aluminum body offerings. In the end all that really counts is if the integrity of the knife is somehow affected. I’m tempted to believe it won’t be or else why would MT be putting these out.
I’ve had quite a few Ultratechs come and go (new ones) and never had this issue.
Structural integrity aside, the collectors market is big so these issues shouldn’t be happening. I personally don’t care about these marks, but people like me are the minority.
people like me are the minority.
I just got one of the new 25th anniversary Socom’s and it as well has the same issue. Mine was produced during the tail end of 2019 so don't know if this issue will change with the new 2020 run. I also have some weird and ugly tool/CNC markings around the lock bar screw hump anchor point. I'll include photos of all this below.I picked this up new from PVK.Vegas about two months ago. It has ridden in my pocket for edc ever since. Has never seen hard use. Noticed today that there are cracks in the aluminum handle at the lock bar locations. I have never seen anything like this. I'll send it in to Microtech for warranty, but bummed I will be without it for a while. Anyone else ever see anything like this?
It seems to only be on the newer ones. I've seen these marks on +$1000.00 Marfione Custom Socom Elites (carbon fibre and aluminium handles).I do wonder why it seems to be only showing up on the newer model Socoms with the external lockbar attachment.
Has anybody seen these marks on other aluminum bodied MicroTechs?
I had never seen these tooling marks on any of MT’s older aluminum body offerings. In the end all that really counts is if the integrity of the knife is somehow affected. I’m tempted to believe it won’t be or else why would MT be putting these out.
Paying that much for a knife I think tooling marks or cracks are NOT negotiable!! That knife should be PERFECT!Are there other types I’m not aware of? Because I’m pretty sure every Socom Elite has its lockbar attached that way.
______________
Personally, I just put the knife right to work and ignored the machining marks. I didn’t buy it to admire and post filtered Instagram pics. However, I can see how this would be an issue for some.
Paying that much for a knife I think tooling marks or cracks are NOT negotiable!! That knife should be PERFECT!
Tiny photos!I just got one of the new 25th anniversary Socom’s and it as well has the same issue. Mine was produced during the tail end of 2019 so don't know if this issue will change with the new 2020 run. I also have some weird and ugly tool/CNC markings around the lock bar screw hump anchor point. I'll include photos of all this below.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Paying that much for a knife I think tooling marks or cracks are NOT negotiable!! That knife should be PERFECT!
Think all you want. 8 months later and I still enjoy that knife![]()
Both of my new ones look that way, and it doesn't bother me. The marks don't impact function and they're barely noticeable. I'm amazed that anyone cares that much about the little marks, but each is entitled to their own opinion.
Microtech could redo the tooling path to not have those marks, but there's no real reason to.
Both of my new ones look that way, and it doesn't bother me. The marks don't impact function and they're barely noticeable. I'm amazed that anyone cares that much about the little marks, but each is entitled to their own opinion.
Microtech could redo the tooling path to not have those marks, but there's no real reason to.