Ban
Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 14, 1998
- Messages
- 4,942
Ok, now that I finally got the videos and pics out of the way I can finally sit down and think about everything that happened today.
1) Edge geometry is still king so long as said geometry is NOT compromised by the material being cut. In other words the edges should be thin and efficient but yet not so thin that it would roll when being used to chop vigorously.
2) Weight definitely adds alot of momentum to the swings. I have noticed a few times today where the larger heavy blades like the FFBM and the FBMLE would just continue to dig deeper into the wood even when my hand and arm is already retracting back ready for the next swing. I also noticed a few times that the shear mass and power of the heavyweights just breaks the wood apart internally. For instance, on my last chop with the FBMLE the piece of 2X4 just literally gave out without having to be cut. Most likely it is because the previous blows have already loosened and destroyed the wood fibers.
3) Comfort and fit was a major factor for me. Large handles like the E handles made it hard for me to hang on to the blade after a few power chops. I find myself having to reposition my grip every few chops. This not only kills time but also breaks the rhythm, timing and momentum. I could have done better with with the ZTBM had the handles fit me better.
4) Balance of blade also plays a big role in chopping performance. Obviously the more blade heavy knives will out chop more neutral balanced ones. However, balance is not quite as critical as edge geometry. A heavy knife has lots of momentum. A weighted forward heavy knife can just generate more momentum with the same weight.
The knives that stood out today all had nice edge geometries and excelled in one or more of the the 4 attributes.!
FFBM Full Convexed Edge = Superb Edge Geometry, Super Heavy, Very Comfortable, and Extremely blade heavy. It excelled in nearly all 4 attributes.
FABM = Superb Edge Geometry, Lightweight, Very Comfortable, Moderately blade heavy.
Buxton Custom Forged 52100 = Extreme Edge Geometry, Very Lightweight, Very Comfortable, and Moderately blade heavy.
This was Jim's answer to my FABM and it put up a helluva impressive chopping performance.
Convexed CGFBM = Superb Edge Geometry, Heavy, Very Comfortable, Very Blade Heavy.
This one put up a quite a impressive chopping performance that surprised me quite a bit.
Which one is the best chopper and which one would I pick? I am very partial to the FABM because it is very lightweight yet can still hang with the massive big boys. We are not talking just a little lighter but a significant weight difference that is probably something close to half the weight of the big boys. However, I must admit that the Full Convexed FFBM is the the best chopper on a chop per chop basis.
Time to go to bed now.... Will post more tomorrow.
1) Edge geometry is still king so long as said geometry is NOT compromised by the material being cut. In other words the edges should be thin and efficient but yet not so thin that it would roll when being used to chop vigorously.
2) Weight definitely adds alot of momentum to the swings. I have noticed a few times today where the larger heavy blades like the FFBM and the FBMLE would just continue to dig deeper into the wood even when my hand and arm is already retracting back ready for the next swing. I also noticed a few times that the shear mass and power of the heavyweights just breaks the wood apart internally. For instance, on my last chop with the FBMLE the piece of 2X4 just literally gave out without having to be cut. Most likely it is because the previous blows have already loosened and destroyed the wood fibers.
3) Comfort and fit was a major factor for me. Large handles like the E handles made it hard for me to hang on to the blade after a few power chops. I find myself having to reposition my grip every few chops. This not only kills time but also breaks the rhythm, timing and momentum. I could have done better with with the ZTBM had the handles fit me better.
4) Balance of blade also plays a big role in chopping performance. Obviously the more blade heavy knives will out chop more neutral balanced ones. However, balance is not quite as critical as edge geometry. A heavy knife has lots of momentum. A weighted forward heavy knife can just generate more momentum with the same weight.
The knives that stood out today all had nice edge geometries and excelled in one or more of the the 4 attributes.!
FFBM Full Convexed Edge = Superb Edge Geometry, Super Heavy, Very Comfortable, and Extremely blade heavy. It excelled in nearly all 4 attributes.
FABM = Superb Edge Geometry, Lightweight, Very Comfortable, Moderately blade heavy.
Buxton Custom Forged 52100 = Extreme Edge Geometry, Very Lightweight, Very Comfortable, and Moderately blade heavy.
This was Jim's answer to my FABM and it put up a helluva impressive chopping performance.
Convexed CGFBM = Superb Edge Geometry, Heavy, Very Comfortable, Very Blade Heavy.
This one put up a quite a impressive chopping performance that surprised me quite a bit.
Which one is the best chopper and which one would I pick? I am very partial to the FABM because it is very lightweight yet can still hang with the massive big boys. We are not talking just a little lighter but a significant weight difference that is probably something close to half the weight of the big boys. However, I must admit that the Full Convexed FFBM is the the best chopper on a chop per chop basis.
Time to go to bed now.... Will post more tomorrow.