- Joined
- Oct 2, 2005
- Messages
- 405
I frankly, flat-out disagree! I think it would be a big waste of his time and if asked I would discourage him from even considering it...which, I doubt he even is or even knows about this forum (good for him). I think the threads on this show at some point starts out reasonably mellow.Cliff Stamp said:...you tell them directly they are wrong or disagree with them and it doesn't turn into a disaster, you just hash out both sides of the argument and figure out what is causing the difference in perspective, some times it goes to email, some times it runs on the web...
They then progress to the...I know he did it wrong, he did it bad, he is a jackass, he is dangerous, he is irresponsible, etc...hostile state.threads said:A lot of the time he is showing improvising with little to no materials, worse case scenario. In various environment a large bag or poncho works well to keep out rain and wind but doesn't provide a lot of direct insulation.
threads said:How he handled the animal indicates many of the main problems with the show, it isn't what you can do once, it is what you can do over and over without harm. …with the flake cutting, that should have been attached to a small stick to make a knife rather than hold it in hand to avoid contamination. Once contaminated any possible source should be eliminated so avoid accidental cross contamination leading back to you. He notes none of this, whereas for example if you talk to someone like Davenport they will because they consider worse case scenarios whereas Stroud always goes by best. The shows are filled with case after case of activity which could get you killed over and over and just horrible decisions...
threads said:…He does things …which could kill you instantly and he does it in every episode, usually he warns not to do it, and then goes right ahead and does it anyway, never showing what you are actually supposed to do and of course this undercuts the actual seriousness of the consequences of doing what he did...
threads said:What he did was irresponsible, and note that he never takes any consideration of if he did get contaminated...
threads said:in such a situation is the first thing … wander off leaving no sign when you were there and where you are going, or using the brightly colored …a signal. If you want to use this to demonstrate what not to do, that is fine, but somewhere actually note this is what you are doing...
threads said:…it is completely irresponsible to joke about eating unidentified mushrooms in the manner in which he did...
threads said:…people out there that have no frigging clue … they are going to eat the mushroom they aren't sure about, or drink the water known to carry deadly parasites, etc. and they are going to die. His actions are irresponsible at best.
threads said:…many people are terrified of using a knife …he may have just talked someone out of including one in their so called *survival kit*. That makes absolutely no sense what so ever to me…
threads said:He often does though is misinforming. …he tries to build an igloo …It isn't the worse kind of snow…Plus that isn't why he fails to build one. His blocks are too long and the aspect ratio is off, they are far too thin and tall. Plus he doesn't bevel the ends or the top, thus none of the surfaces mate correctly and there is no gentle sloping arc...
threads said:What about if he was swinging around a loaded gun while saying you should never point it at anyone, this would not be irresponsible either right because he said what you should do, even if he just demonstrated right after it as an *instructor* he doesn't pay any attention to the "rules"…
If you are "making bank" in TV land, why in the world would you even want to come online and engage in this??? The truth is, he would probably have his comments dissected and then appear in tabloid TV and be TV discredited. Most of the comments have shown little room for debate/discussion. People have made it fairly clear they are right and he is wrong. With all do respect to those disingenuously suggesting it would be a nice and quality discourse, I say:jerkit:threads said:However even if he addressed some issues in this manner, it doesn't fix the impression that the instructor doesn't obey the rules he preaches…
Having said that, I do find some of the discussion useful for me and possibly others. I just have no illusion of grandeur about having a "TV star" join us for some sort of educational pow-wow. Nor do I think any such discourse would have any benefit other then to give some the opportunity to spar and try to show how much better they are or that they should have their own show. Of course, this is all my opinion and I am sure as always that there are those that will disagree.LSkylizard said:...The dude makes money in a specific ENTERTAINMENT niche of television...
