- Joined
- Sep 1, 2012
- Messages
- 306
So much of forum life seems to be show without the tell, or people looking for recommendations for the newest whiz bang being hyped at the moment. I don’t notice much in the way of the real life “why” and “what for”. Thought I’d try to stimulate some “fun” conversation about two knives you don’t generally see compared and why some of us might choose one or the other (not both), for real world day in and day out daily use, not part of a any rotation or for purposes of collecting. Just good old fashioned, buy a single pocket knife and use it until either you or the knife are gone.
The Contenders…the lowly SAK versus the mighty Sebenza
Both are hyped up on the Internet forums.
Both have a cult like following.
Both have proponents and both have opponents
My choice is the SAK…The why and what for…
#1 Utility- the blades and blade steel are fine for what I’ve used them for or I’m most likely going to use them for…cutting fishing line/string/rope/cordage, camp/fieldwork knife, cutting open an Amazon package or mail envelope, cutting an apple or dividing/sharing lunch a field, cutting a stick of pepperoni or block of cheese outdoors somewhere.
#2 Variety- I’m prob as likely or even sometimes more likely to need a screwdriver or scissors or magnifying glass in daily use than the blades. There always seems to be something that needs put together, tightened up, cut, trimmed, or magnified. I can get a lot of home, work, and play tasks done with only a pocketable SAK. Not to mention that even in a liberal work environment , the SAK seems to fly beneath people’s radar.
#3 Well made and long lasting, not to mention affordable. Never had a problem with fit and finish. Always consistent quality and haven’t had any breakage in nearly 20 years of use. The SAK isn’t fancy but it gets jobs done, and if lost is easily replaceable for the average daily user, non knife enthusiast.
Premium made, single blade/use knives have their place. It’s just not in my pocket. I do like the type for a hunting knife though. What about you? For those of you who choose one or the other, care to share what and why?
The Contenders…the lowly SAK versus the mighty Sebenza
Both are hyped up on the Internet forums.
Both have a cult like following.
Both have proponents and both have opponents
My choice is the SAK…The why and what for…
#1 Utility- the blades and blade steel are fine for what I’ve used them for or I’m most likely going to use them for…cutting fishing line/string/rope/cordage, camp/fieldwork knife, cutting open an Amazon package or mail envelope, cutting an apple or dividing/sharing lunch a field, cutting a stick of pepperoni or block of cheese outdoors somewhere.
#2 Variety- I’m prob as likely or even sometimes more likely to need a screwdriver or scissors or magnifying glass in daily use than the blades. There always seems to be something that needs put together, tightened up, cut, trimmed, or magnified. I can get a lot of home, work, and play tasks done with only a pocketable SAK. Not to mention that even in a liberal work environment , the SAK seems to fly beneath people’s radar.
#3 Well made and long lasting, not to mention affordable. Never had a problem with fit and finish. Always consistent quality and haven’t had any breakage in nearly 20 years of use. The SAK isn’t fancy but it gets jobs done, and if lost is easily replaceable for the average daily user, non knife enthusiast.
Premium made, single blade/use knives have their place. It’s just not in my pocket. I do like the type for a hunting knife though. What about you? For those of you who choose one or the other, care to share what and why?
Last edited: