I know that the Talon Hole is a Busse Trademark and that they are sometimes (VERY Rarely) used for D-guards and some other obscure lashing points for spears or something.
But, I have to be honest. I find the Talon Hole to be a nuisance and more of a detractor from function than any possible benefit.
Sorry if this is sacrilege, but it seems the Talon Hole is easily more con than pro to me.
I am sure some will feel the Talon Hole should just be there, but I am looking forward to seeing one justifiable good reason for it.
I think I will be hard to be convinced that any possible far-fetched reason for the Talon Hole will outweigh what I consider to be downsides of the Talon Hole. But, I am still curious.
I like choils, but a beef I have with Busse, Swamp Rat and Scrap Yard are the large distance from the main grip to the choil. When using the choil, I feel my index finger is unnaturally over-extended and I have fairly large hands (More often XL gloves than large.)
The Talon Hole also causes the blades to be shorted about an extra .25" or so on blade edge. I would much rather have more blade edge and no hole than a hole that I don't use.
Knives like the AD, or Meaner or Game Warden (to name a few) would be much better served by having a very small guard that allows your grip to be much closer to the blade edge.
Many of the knives that have a Talon Hole couldn't really have a D-guard and/or don't need one.
If I am missing something, let me know.
Maybe I am being too practical (????), but I am always looking for ways to improve and maximize performance from my knives. Even if minor technical little improvements!
Maybe the Talon Hole has sentimental value to some, but to me the Talon Hole is obstructing performance of many great knives.
I would personally rather see the Busse family of knives continue to improve the product than stick with a sentimental trademark that hinders performance.
...... OK.... now flame away.
But, I would be curious to know who might step up and agree with me as well.
.
But, I have to be honest. I find the Talon Hole to be a nuisance and more of a detractor from function than any possible benefit.
Sorry if this is sacrilege, but it seems the Talon Hole is easily more con than pro to me.
I am sure some will feel the Talon Hole should just be there, but I am looking forward to seeing one justifiable good reason for it.
I think I will be hard to be convinced that any possible far-fetched reason for the Talon Hole will outweigh what I consider to be downsides of the Talon Hole. But, I am still curious.
I like choils, but a beef I have with Busse, Swamp Rat and Scrap Yard are the large distance from the main grip to the choil. When using the choil, I feel my index finger is unnaturally over-extended and I have fairly large hands (More often XL gloves than large.)
The Talon Hole also causes the blades to be shorted about an extra .25" or so on blade edge. I would much rather have more blade edge and no hole than a hole that I don't use.
Knives like the AD, or Meaner or Game Warden (to name a few) would be much better served by having a very small guard that allows your grip to be much closer to the blade edge.
Many of the knives that have a Talon Hole couldn't really have a D-guard and/or don't need one.
If I am missing something, let me know.
Maybe I am being too practical (????), but I am always looking for ways to improve and maximize performance from my knives. Even if minor technical little improvements!
Maybe the Talon Hole has sentimental value to some, but to me the Talon Hole is obstructing performance of many great knives.
I would personally rather see the Busse family of knives continue to improve the product than stick with a sentimental trademark that hinders performance.
...... OK.... now flame away.
But, I would be curious to know who might step up and agree with me as well.
.