Hi,
I have come along a bumpy road of scouring forum posts, videos and online reviews. I now am looking specifically at 2 blades and want to drum up a bit of a debate to help me make my final decision before parting with my cash!
I want a new blade in my collection, something I will be working hard and using till it either breaks on me or it outlives me. Please don't interpret this like I will abuse the knife - I just won't be tiptoeing around like a fanny.
Primary uses besides a general utility cutter will be preparing firewood and small bushcraft tasks like carving, making traps, building pot stands and the like.
I don't need machete like chopping power but will be batoning down wet wood in to dryer match (not big diameters).
I like the fallkniven f1 for its utilitarian style and blade strength - but I LOVE the look of the temperance 2, almost a custom blade in my opinion. And the handle wins over the f1 hands down.
I am leaning towards the spyderco at the moment, by the looks of it it's about as thick as the fallkniven for the most part of the blade so I would think batoning would be fine if I use the back end of the blade and don't go whacking the tip off the knife like some brainless oaf.
...but perhaps the steel will be too brittle?
....and then do I want a flat ground blade???
I'm well aware the spiderco comes from a fighting/defence design but it looks like it would make a great all rounder, I mean... A baseball bat was built for sport but 9 out of 10 people have one behind the front door!! .
SO... What are your experiences with these blades?? Has anyone had the guts to go out and use the temperance 2 the way we all want to (and are probably too afraid to do!!)
has anyone got both?? I would love to see some side by side photos as I can't walk in to a shop and look at them where I love.
I'm in the UK and there's £50 between the two knives so money isn't really a factor in my decision making process.
I have come along a bumpy road of scouring forum posts, videos and online reviews. I now am looking specifically at 2 blades and want to drum up a bit of a debate to help me make my final decision before parting with my cash!
I want a new blade in my collection, something I will be working hard and using till it either breaks on me or it outlives me. Please don't interpret this like I will abuse the knife - I just won't be tiptoeing around like a fanny.
Primary uses besides a general utility cutter will be preparing firewood and small bushcraft tasks like carving, making traps, building pot stands and the like.
I don't need machete like chopping power but will be batoning down wet wood in to dryer match (not big diameters).
I like the fallkniven f1 for its utilitarian style and blade strength - but I LOVE the look of the temperance 2, almost a custom blade in my opinion. And the handle wins over the f1 hands down.
I am leaning towards the spyderco at the moment, by the looks of it it's about as thick as the fallkniven for the most part of the blade so I would think batoning would be fine if I use the back end of the blade and don't go whacking the tip off the knife like some brainless oaf.
...but perhaps the steel will be too brittle?
....and then do I want a flat ground blade???
I'm well aware the spiderco comes from a fighting/defence design but it looks like it would make a great all rounder, I mean... A baseball bat was built for sport but 9 out of 10 people have one behind the front door!! .
SO... What are your experiences with these blades?? Has anyone had the guts to go out and use the temperance 2 the way we all want to (and are probably too afraid to do!!)
has anyone got both?? I would love to see some side by side photos as I can't walk in to a shop and look at them where I love.
I'm in the UK and there's £50 between the two knives so money isn't really a factor in my decision making process.