May i ask why you say that?The "entry level" shiros are a more satisfying ownership experience, imo
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
May i ask why you say that?The "entry level" shiros are a more satisfying ownership experience, imo
The upgraded materials and construction don't justify the price increase for my purposes.May i ask why you say that?
Interesting point, Chuck. The more basic models are well made, have great action, good steel, are excellent cutters, and feel good in hand. More expensive models have arguably higher end materials, more extensive milling, and are intended to be more visually attractive, but are they really truly functionally superior? I've always been a fan of Shiro serial production models and do find a number of their "lesser" versions appealing.The upgraded materials and construction don't justify the price increase for my purposes.
Yeah, I do like the F3, Hati, Quantum Ursus, HatiOn and NeOn, etcThe "entry level" shiros are a more satisfying ownership experience, imo
I sometimes regret not snagging the used White Dr Death earlier this year on the exchange, as I was the first to see it posted; but the $2400 was a bit much when my wife wants to retire next yearMy 111 and my 2 95's are great knives!
The doctor death is well worth the price in my opinion. Long sleek blade with no weight hardly at all!
View attachment 2671199
I wasn't knocking the more expensive Shiros--all but one of mine are of the full-priced, serial production ilk, save for my RDD, though I believe my NeOn UL was an early "budget" offering with its "lesser" steel and no backspacer.My 111 and my 2 95's are great knives!
The doctor death is well worth the price in my opinion. Long sleek blade with no weight hardly at all!
View attachment 2671199
I've owned more high(er)-end shiros as well, and tend to be more satisfied with "entry-level" for what i want in a knife. Ymmv, of course.I wasn't knocking the more expensive Shiros--all but one of mine are of the full-priced, serial production ilk, save for my RDD, though I believe my NeOn UL was an early "budget" offering with its "lesser" steel and no backspacer.
I like all your knives a lot, Phil, and am really pleased with mine too, especially the RDD, though getting it from a friend here at well below original pricing certainly plays into it. All get carried and used.
Chuck_Nunface 's point was a "bang for your buck" kinda thing in that Shiro's "entry level" gives you a great knife at a more modest price and there's considerable satisfaction in that. Some of the "budget" models are indeed very attractive.
Interesting point, Chuck. The more basic models are well made, have great action, good steel, are excellent cutters, and feel good in hand. More expensive models have arguably higher end materials, more extensive milling, and are intended to be more visually attractive, but are they really truly functionally superior? I've always been a fan of Shiro serial production models and do find a number of their "lesser" versions appealing.
OTOH, I did find my QUNL kinda meh and sold it, but that one had a real budget feel to it and I'm really not much of a Quantum fan anyway.
I suppose I should have qualified my use of the term "budget" to "budget Shiro". I had the original F95NL World Tour Knife to use for a few weeks and that didn't feel at all budget, just a little more basic materials/features-wise, with no internal milling, Elmax steel, and SRBS. The QUNL was described by Tom as intended to be a "workhorse" but I'd always go to my early gen Turtle or Hati or my Tabargan for a work knife. Those three have a premium feel to them that I just didn't get from the QUNL, which pretty much just sat in the drawer.I have the Quantum R1P which feels very refined, and a QUNL with Dept13 copper-powder carbon fiber inlays, and it feels pretty nice too. But those are the only two I've handled.
Three of my F3 are users (emerald micarta, purple CF, and one Aquatic) and I think you'd like that.I suppose I should have qualified my use of the term "budget" to "budget Shiro". I had the original F95NL World Tour Knife to use for a few weeks and that didn't feel at all budget, just a little more basic materials/features-wise, with no internal milling, Elmax steel, and SRBS. The QUNL was described by Tom as intended to be a "workhorse" but I'd always go to my early gen Turtle or Hati or my Tabargan for a work knife. Those three have a premium feel to them that I just didn't get from the QUNL, which pretty much just sat in the drawer.
Though I haven't handled either the entry level 111's or F3's, they appear to be more like what I'd expect from Shiro and I'm very tempted by the latter as I'd like to have an F3 for a work user as I try to keep my Python cleaner.
Oh and if anybody has any helpful info on doing a scale swap on this. I'm all ears. The disassembly process alludes the entirety of the internet. lol
Thinking it's probably somewhat straightforward, but my confidence waxes and wanes.
I have the maroon version too and it’s definitely badass, I love the distinctive double click. I recently picked up the tool from Rob and took mine apart to clean and it wasn’t as easy as taking apart my other Shiro’s. There’s more pieces to keep lined up and the damn roller bearings liked to stand on end vs laying down when trying to get them back into their slots.
Needless to say, after carrying mine plenty since they first came out, it wasn’t that dirty inside, surprisingly clean compared to other Shiro’s, I don’t see much reason to take it apart again! Lol. I didn’t take pics but I think you’re going to have to take the whole knife apart to do the scale swap since the belt clip is held from the reverse side through the liner.