- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 4,971
So this crazy sale today has only reaffirmed my belief that the demand for the Field knife will not even come close to being satiated by the remaining sales and pre-order list before Nathan retires the model next year.
So looking around the market, trying to find something I do not have that is similar enough to make a direct comparison, but different enough to warrant the purchase of for comparison/companion sake, there is nothing I have found in the same price range or even close that looks like it could compare favorably against is. Disclaimer, I made this post declaring the FK my favorite mid sized knife of all time soooo I might be a TAD bias.
The FK being the excellent value it is in the mid $200s compares well against so many models that are $100~ more expensive than it range that it makes them look... maybe like the cost is tied up in parts of the knife that are more about looks than about function.
What do you guys think? Is the FK priced below market value? I would say it is easily a $325 knife. Would having the price being higher would have changed the current demand?
I also think it is way too great of a design just to be filed away into the history books. To me such a usable, destined to be classic design like this, that is such a success could even be sold to a larger manufacturer who could carry on the production of it. Like Lorien, Nathan and Jo could have this thing made by one of the large manufactures as a collaboration. I have seen way inferior designs out there done in the same fashion.
Or am I out to lunch here?
I guess what it comes down to, despite my efforts to leave some FKs for other people by finding an alternative, I think I will have to shut the proxy service down on the FK and pick up a couple more for myself, my future children, and grandchildren. Maybe their children too.
Edit: Removed reference to secondary market value that seems to be triggering people.
So looking around the market, trying to find something I do not have that is similar enough to make a direct comparison, but different enough to warrant the purchase of for comparison/companion sake, there is nothing I have found in the same price range or even close that looks like it could compare favorably against is. Disclaimer, I made this post declaring the FK my favorite mid sized knife of all time soooo I might be a TAD bias.
The FK being the excellent value it is in the mid $200s compares well against so many models that are $100~ more expensive than it range that it makes them look... maybe like the cost is tied up in parts of the knife that are more about looks than about function.
What do you guys think? Is the FK priced below market value? I would say it is easily a $325 knife. Would having the price being higher would have changed the current demand?
I also think it is way too great of a design just to be filed away into the history books. To me such a usable, destined to be classic design like this, that is such a success could even be sold to a larger manufacturer who could carry on the production of it. Like Lorien, Nathan and Jo could have this thing made by one of the large manufactures as a collaboration. I have seen way inferior designs out there done in the same fashion.
Or am I out to lunch here?
I guess what it comes down to, despite my efforts to leave some FKs for other people by finding an alternative, I think I will have to shut the proxy service down on the FK and pick up a couple more for myself, my future children, and grandchildren. Maybe their children too.
Edit: Removed reference to secondary market value that seems to be triggering people.
Last edited: