The process and priciples of quenching

Kevin, what would you consider to be a better set-up, a circulation pump or some type of agitation [such as viberation]? My quench tanks are steel cylinders w/ about 3.5 gal. capacity so either way would be feasable.

Also, would the benefits of circulation be more critical w/ p50 than AAA because of the speeds we try to achive, or would the slower oil benefit equally??

Great info!! Thank you for the amount of time you spend sharing your knowledge!!


I find circulation to work best, and movent of the oil is important with AAA and #50. Above and beyond quench speed you also have even cooling to consider, so if you have all the speed you want with the oil sitting still you still do not have the more even cooling to help in reducing distortion.
 
Speaking of circulation, how much is enough, and how to accomplish it? A paddle or fan-type stirrer would be easiest.
I prolly shouldn't put oil in my 5 gallon ultrasonic cleaner, huh???:rolleyes:
It would be an unknown, non-repeatable disaster, but it sure would speed up a quench. :D
 
Speaking of circulation, how much is enough, and how to accomplish it? A paddle or fan-type stirrer would be easiest.
I prolly shouldn't put oil in my 5 gallon ultrasonic cleaner, huh???:rolleyes:
It would be an unknown, non-repeatable disaster, but it sure would speed up a quench. :D

Don't know that would be a disaster... there is a little discussion on using it (I believe in "Metallurgy" by B.J. Moniz) as a tool to eliminate vapor phase, thus eliminating the problems vapor phase causes. Should be useable with about any quenchant and an interrupted quench.

Mike
 
Okay, I'm convinced -- I'm going to begin building a proper quench tank and find some Parks #50. Actually, is Parks the proper quenchant for O1? (And can someone suggest a source? I can never find it when I go looking.)

This discussion clears up some things I've experienced that I believe will virtually disappear when I get a better system going. Thanks a million Kevin, this is always good stuff.

NBS Monograph 88 26.63 MB .pdf file. Might be a while to download...
I've never found an MSDS on Parks/Heatbath products. Do they exist?

Thanks! Just the ticket.
 
Now if I'd been paying attention, you already said it was important to break up the vapor barrier. I get tunnel vision and was only thinking about speed and heat dispersion. Sorry to make you repeat yourself.

I do stir my oil just before pulling a blade from the oven to help equalize the heat in the oil. My tanks are about 30" deep so I quench almost to the full depth, back to the top, then start a slicing motion. My main problem is warpage. No matter how many times I normalize, I seem to get some distortion. Maybe I'll set up a vibrator to see if that helps. My first thought was the swirl from stiring was cooling one side just a bit faster than the other.

Just some food for thought. Thanks for keeping us thinking about the small stuff and overlooked details. Every little bit makes a difference!!
 
Might be a while to download...
I've never found an MSDS on Parks/Heatbath products. Do they exist?

I've got Park's data on #50 and AAA but they are in .pdf's and I can't put them up here... or can't that I know of. I'd send them to anyone who can post them. Oh, Kevin has them, and they are supposed to be up on Don Fogg's Bladesmith Forums somewhere (I sent the Park .pdf's to both of them a few years ago). I would have thought both Mr. Ellis and Patrick have the data, also.

Mike
 
Okay, I'm convinced -- I'm going to begin building a proper quench tank and find some Parks #50. Actually, is Parks the proper quenchant for O1? (And can someone suggest a source? I can never find it when I go looking.)

This discussion clears up some things I've experienced that I believe will virtually disappear when I get a better system going. Thanks a million Kevin, this is always good stuff.



Thanks! Just the ticket.
Dave, any of the medium speed quenchants will work for O1, Chevron, Texaco, Tough-quench, Houghton makes several and then there is AAA by Park Metallurgical. #50 is actually overkill for O1. I am glad to hear of your decision but this thread did not have the intentions of suggesting any quenchant over the other (certainly not a particular brand, especially one that is a PITA to get). I believe you did exactly what I hoped could be done from this thread, that is make an informed decision based upon what really goes in on quenching and the factors that make the whole operation more pleasant and successful. To be certain, there are some vegetable oils and automotive products that can fully harden many steels, particularly one like O1, but as I keep reiterating, simple cooling power is but one consideration that we should look at when determining what will accomplish our goals most effectively. When we approach a grinder, metal removal is our objective so why do we not just use a 36X or 24X belts exclusively? Instead we have wide ranges of grits and abrasive materials we work with to achieve our goals, much the same if cooling power was all that mattered then we would need nothing more than brine for quenching.

Which brings me to another desirable property of a quenchant…

Final blade surface and cleanup. Just a few days ago I got a call from another maker fro advice on quenching, he reminded of this feature when he noted how much cleaner his blades come out of the quench now that he is using a well formulated quench oil. Any oil that comes into contact with glowing hot steel will have abrupt chemical reactions to it. Many organic oils will break down and deposit bits of nasty crust and scale on the blade (just ask you wife about this the next time she is scrubbing on a blackened pan that had oil burned in it). Often if the chemistry was not designed to remain neutral under the extreme heat there will be staining of the steel as well. Often when a really good quench oil is reaching the end of its life it will become evident by the increased sating of the quenched parts. I have also seen some oils that can have a carburizing or decarburizing effect on the steel and leave a nasty marbled surface of high an low spots on the blade that requires quite a bit of effort to return to smooth, I am certain others have seen this annoying issue before.

A good quenchant will account for this and have much thought into how true to the original finish the heat treated part will be, we would be doing ourselves a favor in adding it to our considerations as well.

Safety. Two things come to mind when considering safety, the threat of fire and the possible risks involved with the vapors released from the quenchant. Both of these are heavily dependant on the vapor forming tendencies of the oil itself. What is the vapor point of the quenchant? What is the flash point of the quenchant? Will filling your shop with heavy amounts of that vaporized quenchant be good for you? Will the quenchant have a greater change of bursting into flames any time you use it? You certainly won’t get a good quench if you are more concerned about the flames going up your arm than you are about the quenching operation.

I get nervous about many automotive products and the vapors they could release when used in this manner. Even good commercial quench oils are not the healthiest stuff to take into your lungs, but they were designed not to be there in the first place. This is where we need to determine if our methods and operations are well matched fro our quenchant. For example, edge quenching has an inordinately high chance of leading to heavy smoking or flashing, it may be best to avoid oils that will form heavy vapor and have hazardous components in that vapor. Most commercial quenchants were not designed for this type of use and I try my best to discourage people from wasting their money and lungs with a dedicated quenching oil if this is the method they plan to use.
Park’s #50 has a surprisingly low flash point, yet its vapor tendencies are so low that in all the years I have been quenching into it I have never had a flash with a full quench.

Another example of poorly matching of methods with materials is simply assuming that one can heat any oil to 400F and perform marquenching. The obvious danger of this is introducing a 1450F+ blade into an oil that is already a few degrees from its vapor or flash point. Some people will examine this just enough to choose an oil that naturally resist flashing, but then totally overlook the fact that most oils have a “sweet spot” around 130-150F and then take a significant nose dive in cooling ability above this range. I have seen some oils virtually loose their thermal transfer rates above 225F. Industry spent much time an effort to develop oils specifically for marquenching, and for good reason, it is a very special oil that can handle prolonged periods at 400F+ cool steel well and not burn the heat treating facility to the ground. This is one area that is most prone to misinterpretation of the results, many blades cooled in hot oils not designed for marquenching are just full of fine pearlite but have enough martensite to skate that file. If one looks closely they will often see a faint hamon about ¼” to 5/16” from the edge of blades done this way, anything outside of this line is nothing but fine pearlite and within that edge zone you will find a mixture. I include this last part to implore people to ask themselves if endangering their shop and their life is worth a partially martensitic edge.
400F+ potassium based salts are treacherous enough, but they at least will not burst into flames when you put a blade into them.
 
Okay, I'm convinced -- I'm going to begin building a proper quench tank and find some Parks #50. Actually, is Parks the proper quenchant for O1? (And can someone suggest a source? I can never find it when I go looking.)

O1 would be better suited to Park AAA.

If you search here you will find a small amount of discussion on Houghton International quenchants, Houghto-quench "G" and Houghto-quench "K", to be specific. "G" is equivalent to Park AAA and "K" is equivalent to Park #50. Both these quench oils are more stable in long term use than the Park oils... that is, they don't require additive additions as time goes on to maintain their designed cooling curve. Kevin and others are going to know how that plays out in knife maker use... I don't.

Mike
 
kevin....you were talking about oil and it's viscosity and stuff.....and i have read alot of people say to preheat your quench oil.....i am not sure if you were one of them....i'm not trying to put words in your mouth.....my question is say it's a nice day in the summer....maybe 80 degrees......from what i have read i have heard people heat their oil anywhere from around a hundred to 140 or so from what i have read....so let;'s say that is a difference of around 60 degrees.....why worry about such a small temperature differnce when you are pluging steel that is over a thousand degrees into the oil?.....could u explain this a little please.....ryan
 
I find circulation to work best, and movement of the oil is important with AAA and #50. Above and beyond quench speed you also have even cooling to consider, so if you have all the speed you want with the oil sitting still you still do not have the more even cooling to help in reducing distortion.

When we introduce agitation into the quench, common sense tells me we need to be very careful to maintain a level of symmetry in the direction of flow relative to how the blade enters the quenchant.
For instance, we wouldn't want a pump directing the quenchant flow so that it hits the blade from one side. Something in and of itself that could create distortion due to uneven cooling.

I can certainly see the advantage agitation provides when quenching multiple blades, one after the other. However, many BladeSmiths are quenching only one blade at a time, evenly slicing the blade into and through the quenchant to reduce the effects vapor barrier could have on cooling.

Would it be fair to say that agitation might be considered an advanced technique that should only be considered after having mastered and understood the basic techniques first ?

Great thread BTW :thumbup: :thumbup: Thanks !!



:cool:
 
Dave, any of the medium speed quenchants will work for O1, Chevron, Texaco, Tough-quench, Houghton makes several and then there is AAA by Park Metallurgical. #50 is actually overkill for O1. I am glad to hear of your decision but this thread did not have the intentions of suggesting any quenchant over the other (certainly not a particular brand, especially one that is a PITA to get).

Thanks Kevin, that's exactly what I needed to know. I've used Brownell's Tough Quench for small blades (because I bought a small quantity ;)) with great success. Is that what you're referring to above? If so, I'll add a suitable quantity to my next order. Getting that stuff is very straightforward.

O1 would be better suited to Park AAA.

If you search here you will find a small amount of discussion on Houghton International quenchants, Houghto-quench "G" and Houghto-quench "K", to be specific. "G" is equivalent to Park AAA and "K" is equivalent to Park #50. Both these quench oils are more stable in long term use than the Park oils... that is, they don't require additive additions as time goes on to maintain their designed cooling curve. Kevin and others are going to know how that plays out in knife maker use... I don't.

Mike

Thank you too, Mike. I love this job! Wish I could make it pay like a full time one. :D It's what I look forward to all week.
 
The nicest set up I've used was in a lab. A large tank [ 5'x5' ?] and in the center at the bottom of the tank was a pump .That put a column of oil moving up with good velocity. That's agitation !
 
That sounds fantastic - almost too good to be true. :D

I'm thinking of building (or preferably finding) a tank with dimensions like Fred described - narrow, long and the right depth to hold 5 gal comfortably. It would need a pump to direct a stream of oil toward the blade, but I haven't quite figured out the right "direction" for that stream to flow. It'd also need a heating element and ideally a thermocouple to maintain temp. Should be stainless steel with a sealable lid, if I'm going to dream up something totally silly and ideal.

Anyone have any ideas what an existing container of appropriate dimensions might be? I'd prefer not to have to have it fabricated if possible. ;)
 
...Would it be fair to say that agitation might be considered an advanced technique that should only be considered after having mastered and understood the basic techniques first ?


Yes, that is not only fair to say, but I totally agree in so far as equipment to move the oil. For the most part we can do a lot just by moving the blade through the oil, and what I am encouraging is for people to take the leap in overcoming their fear of warping a blade by any movement and enjoy the benefits described. As far as moving the oil instead, we all like to build new toys in or shops occasionally, among the list of gadgets we could include a circulation system, but to be honest I currently have no circulation systems on my oils and rely on blade movement. I did have a circulation system on my salt pots but I don't want to talk about now:grumpy:
 
kevin....you were talking about oil and it's viscosity and stuff.....and i have read alot of people say to preheat your quench oil.....i am not sure if you were one of them....i'm not trying to put words in your mouth.....my question is say it's a nice day in the summer....maybe 80 degrees......from what i have read i have heard people heat their oil anywhere from around a hundred to 140 or so from what i have read....so let;'s say that is a difference of around 60 degrees.....why worry about such a small temperature differnce when you are pluging steel that is over a thousand degrees into the oil?.....could u explain this a little please.....ryan

Once again it has to do with the ease with which the entire mass of oil can move not just the stuff right next to the blade. If the whole is sluggish the liquid right around the blade will be superheated (some even vaporized) and not be able to be effectively dissipated into the surrounding oil. To oil at room temp a mere 60 degreess is huge. Some very fast oils will indeed work fine at 80F due to their very low viscosity, but Park's #50 gets very "thick" on a cold Michigan winter day and adding 60 degrees to it will have it back to its watery self. Oil based substances can actually be insulators instead of conductors when they are thick enough, think about what fat does for many animals.
 
Once again it has to do with the ease with which the entire mass of oil can move not just the stuff right next to the blade. If the whole is sluggish the liquid right around the blade will be superheated (some even vaporized) and not be able to be effectively dissipated into the surrounding oil. To oil at room temp a mere 60 degreess is huge. Some very fast oils will indeed work fine at 80F due to their very low viscosity, but Park's #50 gets very "thick" on a cold Michigan winter day and adding 60 degrees to it will have it back to its watery self. Oil based substances can actually be insulators instead of conductors when they are thick enough, think about what fat does for many animals.
I don't heat #50 90% of the time becuase I live in Florida:D But when it gets cool here in January/February, I do warm it up a bit to keep it above the 70F "low range: of its stated operating temperature range.
 
i never thought of fat as an insulator as a good analogy...makes sense kevin...thansk for the input....ryan
 
Ryan, You are confusing temperature with quench rate.
If the oil quenchant was capable of instantly removing the heat from the blade, it would only need to be any temperature below 200F. However, the dynamics that Kevin explained - vapor jacket, jacket collapse,convection, etc. - all make the temperature of the oil important. As Kevin pointed out, the temperature of the oil is very much a factor to its viscosity and the ability for convection to occur. 60 degrees won't mean squat to a blade at 1500F, but it can mean a lot to the oil as the blade cools down in it. In many oils, it can mean the difference between a fully martensitic blade and a poor mix of structures.
This is one of the reasons why marquenching in molten salt works so well.
Stacy
 
Back
Top