A few posts above have mentioned a point I personally agree with - the locking feature is ‘mostly’ redundant for most tasks.
The one handed opening is a useful feature though, for those of us who need to use a knife in situations where one hand is engaged. Kayakers, rafters, mountaineers etc. Even home jobs on occasion.
I woud lean toward those modern features for the adventure sports environment. But for just opening a package or for out in the garden - no discernible difference between a modern knife and a traditional. I will pick up whichever type is in my eyeline!
I guess this is what confuses me about the modern knife; it seems like a lot pf people think if you make the folder bigger and stronger, it will take the place of a much better knife we had way back when. It was called a sheath knife. Now they call them fixed blades, even though they were never broken and needed fixing. The original one hand knife. Take it out and use, put back.
I grew up using slip joint pocket knives for most everything. It it was too small, or we needed more blade, we used a sheath knife. If we were out in the woods and mountains, we had the typical "Official Scout knife" that was a 4ish inch blade with the stacked leather handles on our belt. Or we may have a army-navy store surplus blade like the Camillus MK1or MK2.
I'm mystified by the over built locking folders used over the simple sheath knife. No folder with any whiz bang lock mechanism is going to be near as strong as one solid piece of steel from tip to butt. It I'm going in the boonies or what would classify as an adventure, even at my age, a sheath knife is going to be on my hip. One of my oldest users is a Buck 102. It handles what my pocket knife can't. If that is too little, then I go to a small machete.
Last edited: