Thinking of a Buck 110 pro as my permanent EDC. Thoughts?

I really wanted the 916, but the handle steered me away, especially with my massive palms. I would love another buck fixed blade and I’m thinking 124.
Trying to be the best enabler I can be...
The 124 is a great blade/knife. Depending on when the 124 was produced there are differences in the handle shape and sizing. The early one with the wrap around Phenolic handle are smaller and rounder than the more recent production. The ones in the 80s and 90s are slab handles, larger, Micarta and Dymalux(laminated). The 2000s are big, squarish and blocky Micarta.
First photo, slab handle's difference, recent on the right.
Second photo early Phenolic on top, recent on the bottom.
Here's a link to a thread I started when I was searching for a Buck bowie https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/lets-see-those-900-series-bowies.1817527/
Id5dCCf.jpg

YrwLJTb.jpg
 
Trying to be the best enabler I can be...
The 124 is a great blade/knife. Depending on when the 124 was produced there are differences in the handle shape and sizing. The early one with the wrap around Phenolic handle are smaller and rounder than the more recent production. The ones in the 80s and 90s are slab handles, larger, Micarta and Dymalux(laminated). The 2000s are big, squarish and blocky Micarta.
First photo, slab handle's difference, recent on the right.
Second photo early Phenolic on top, recent on the bottom.
Here's a link to a thread I started when I was searching for a Buck bowie https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/lets-see-those-900-series-bowies.1817527/
Id5dCCf.jpg

YrwLJTb.jpg
Excellent knives! I love the clip point 7 1/2 blade of the 916, and the micarta handle of the 124. If Buck made a 916 with the 124 handle I’d be all over it.
 
Excellent choice! The 110
is a little long for some of my pants or shorts so I removed the clip from one and use the nylon sheath. It's so light that I sometimes forget that it's there.
View attachment 1838260
I only use the nylon sheaths for my 110 edc at work lately.
I think they are more durable.

The 110 pro is one of my favorites.
Put an s35v blade on it it would be perfect
 
do it until you find your next permanent edc
Spoken like a true knife knut and I am one too.
I recently bought a plain ol 110 Slim and I love it. Never thought I could ever love a $30 dollar knife as much as I love it.
Maybe someday I can afford to buy the one with S30V like the OP is contemplating. I can only dream at this time.
 
Y-Not? I carried a standard 110 or Old Timer 7OT pretty much every day (including school and gone to church days) from 1968 to 2020/2021 when I got a couple classic two blade slipjoint folding hunters to mix it up a little. With belt carry you don't notice the weight.

Admittedly a few times when I went hunting I replaced the 110 I was wearing with a Western L66 or Schrade Sharpfinger when in the woods or corn fields, and when in uniform at the Civil War reenactments I had to wear a "historically accurate"/"period correct" fixed blade that weekend, leaving the 110 at home.

Anyway, the 110 makes a great and capable EDC and woods/bushcraft knife. I never felt "under knifed" when in the boonies or more remote sticks with just a standard 110, standard 301 or other "large" stockman (I don't care for the "medium" stockman) and a 4 blade Scout-Camp/Demo knife. (when at the reenactments I kept the stockman and scout/demo knife in my haversack or possibles bag. In the 1860's and prior, trouser pockets hadn't been invented yet.)
 
Y-Not? I carried a standard 110 or Old Timer 7OT pretty much every day (including school and gone to church days) from 1968 to 2020/2021 when I got a couple classic two blade slipjoint folding hunters to mix it up a little. With belt carry you don't notice the weight.

Admittedly a few times when I went hunting I replaced the 110 I was wearing with a Western L66 or Schrade Sharpfinger when in the woods or corn fields, and when in uniform at the Civil War reenactments I had to wear a "historically accurate"/"period correct" fixed blade that weekend, leaving the 110 at home.

Anyway, the 110 makes a great and capable EDC and woods/bushcraft knife. I never felt "under knifed" when in the boonies or more remote sticks with just a standard 110, standard 301 or other "large" stockman (I don't care for the "medium" stockman) and a 4 blade Scout-Camp/Demo knife. (when at the reenactments I kept the stockman and scout/demo knife in my haversack or possibles bag. In the 1860's and prior, trouser pockets hadn't been invented yet.)
gotta ask......which side did ya participate on..
were ya dressed in confedrate grey or yankee blue?
 
gotta ask......which side did ya participate on..
were ya dressed in confedrate grey or yankee blue?
Gray or Butterscotch. It was at least $3,000 less expensive even back then than being in blue. The Confederacy didn't issue arms to a lot of the troops; they used what they brought from home that had been hanging over the fireplace mantle, for example. Hence I could use my (percussion) .45 caliber "Kentucky" rifle. I didn't have to buy a (reproduction) .577 Enfield or one of the .58 caliber Springfields, Mississippi, Whitworth, or Zouave rifled for $590 plus. (Confederates using a Northern arm probably got it after the battle from someone that didn't need it anymore, or possibly from those they took prisoner.
They were also not issued all the various leather good, or even uniforms.

Gray wool pants, a suitable vest, and paisley shirts could be found cheap at the second/third hand store. It was easy enough to sew a rank stripe the proper width (in my case 1.5 inch; 1sgt) of the proper color (red for artillery) over the outside seams of the trousers, remove the belt loops, attach buttons for suspenders, and the other modifications to make them period correct. I bought a used field jacket and kepi. Had to change the yellow (cavalry) trim to red and change the buttons on the jacket, but that was easy enough, and saved me $100 or so.
I had a brass frame Remington 1858 New Army (looked close enough at a distance to pass for one of the solid top confederate revolvers, tho both sides had some Colt 1851 Navy, 1860 Army, and 1858 Remington).

The year before I had to quit I went to a yard sale. I bought a 5 gallon oak water barrel with spigot and rack, wood canteen, and his original .69 caliber smoothbore Confederate issue musket that was in shootable condition (he loaded it "like a 20 guage shotgun" and used it for duck hunting. (A reproduction Brown Bess bayonet with a minor modification to the slot fit the musket. (Upper Mississippi River Valley Mercantile Exchange (small store big name) had the bayonet, rank stripes, buttons, flap holster, 2" gun belt, CSA belt buckle, cap pouch, tins of musket and Number 11 caps etc. I needed. Since we were artillery, the good folks holding the event gave us no less than 5 pounds of powder when we signed in. (infantry and calvary usually got one, maybe two pounds of powder. Even 3/4 scale canon use a lot of powder. We could get 4 shots per pound. First Iowa had an original war era 16 pounder. I believe they got between 1.5 and twoo shots per pound. Like us, they used 4 ounces of baking powder in their powder charges for extra boom and smoke ... tho they might have used 6 or 8 ounces of flour.
Even after the guy that owned the canon quit and refused to sell the gun, making us dismounted artillery, they never cut our powder ration. Everyone who was a member of the group had 10 to 40 pounds of powder at home, depending on how long he was with us. I only had a bit over 18 pounds when I had to resign. I shot my muzzleloaders at the range a couple times a week ....
 
Back
Top