- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
- Messages
- 615
1.Knife... probably a bravo 1 ss
2.Rat firesteel has a built in compass
3.Pot
2.Rat firesteel has a built in compass
3.Pot
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
1. Coffee
2. Beer
3. Wine
In that order
I think you have it slightly wrong. This line of thinking could get you killed.
I believe they concluded that there is nowhere in the Continental US that was not within 20 miles from the NEAREST road.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/8519/title/Math_Trek__Miles_from_Nowhere
There are a lot of places you could walk quite a bit further than 20 miles without hitting a road.
Carl-
If it wasn't considered cheating, this "3 item" scenario does make a good argument for choosing a knife with a hollow handle. This would give you a compass in the buttcap and a firesteel in the handle. Then the other two choices could be a pot and a tarp.
Is there a hollow handle knife that you would pick and trust or would you not stray from your favorite fixed blade choice?
Why yes, TAH, I would.
1) Randall #18 or Chris Reeve Shadow IV packed with matches, firesteel, Tinder Quik tabs, and compass
2) Pot
3) Tarp
Note: I've decided a hollow handle knife is not cheating for two reasons: 1) It's a one unit knife and those items would be permanently stored in the handle anyway. 2) It's my thread.![]()
![]()
Note: I've decided a hollow handle knife is not cheating for two reasons: 1) It's a one unit knife and those items would be permanently stored in the handle anyway. 2) It's my thread.
1.Knife... probably a bravo 1 ss
2.Rat firesteel has a built in compass
3.Pot
I think you have it slightly wrong. This line of thinking could get you killed.
I believe they concluded that there is nowhere in the Continental US that was not within 20 miles from the NEAREST road.
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/8519/title/Math_Trek__Miles_from_Nowhere
There are a lot of places you could walk quite a bit further than 20 miles without hitting a road.
Carl-
Sorry, I have to disagree. The data is that you can't get more than 20 miles from a road. (Backpacker 9/08 citing data from U of WY Science Center). Think about your statement logically. If the nearest road was 20 miles away you could get further away from it by heading in the opposite direction. The date for the lower 48 is that you can't get more than 20 miles from a road. If you head away from that one you get closer than 20 to a different one.
That doesn't mean a compass isn't a good thing to have. But it does suggest that it is far more important to be able to head in a straight line (and not walk in a circle), which doesn't require a compass. If you can do that consistently and aren't injured you can get out.
But, as has already been pointed out, not all roads are created equal: some roads are more equal than others. That means that some roads are less equal a lot less. I believe that Backpacker was including Forest Service roads and fire breaks. Forest Service roads may not see a vehicle for months at a time.
Let's assume though, that you do reach a road. You know it goes somewhere, but which way do you turn? One choice may get you out of your situation, while the other could get you deeper.